» Articles » PMID: 28753616

Regeneration of the Digestive System in the Crinoid Himerometra Robustipinna Occurs by Transdifferentiation of Neurosecretory-like Cells

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28753616
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The structure and regeneration of the digestive system in the crinoid Himerometra robustipinna (Carpenter, 1881) were studied. The gut comprises a spiral tube forming radial lateral processes, which gives it a five-lobed shape. The digestive tube consists of three segments: esophagus, intestine, and rectum. The epithelia of these segments have different cell compositions. Regeneration of the gut after autotomy of the visceral mass progresses very rapidly. Within 6 h after autotomy, an aggregation consisting of amoebocytes, coelomic epithelial cells and juxtaligamental cells (neurosecretory neurons) forms on the inner surface of the skeletal calyx. At 12 h post-autotomy, transdifferentiation of the juxtaligamental cells starts. At 24 h post-autotomy these cells undergo a mesenchymal-epithelial-like transition, resulting in the formation of the luminal epithelium of the gut. Specialization of the intestinal epithelial cells begins on day 2 post-autotomy. At this stage animals acquire the mouth and anal opening. On day 4 post-autotomy the height of both the enterocytes and the visceral mass gradually increases. Proliferation does not play any noticeable role in gut regeneration. The immersion of animals in a 10-7 M solution of colchicine neither stopped formation of the lost structures nor caused accumulation of mitoses in tissues. Weakly EdU-labeled nuclei were observed in the gut only on day 2 post-autotomy and were not detected at later regeneration stages. Single mitotically dividing cells were recorded during the same period. It is concluded that juxtaligamental cells play a major role in gut regeneration in H. robustipinna. The main mechanisms of morphogenesis are cell migration and transdifferentiation.

Citing Articles

The Role of the Microbiota in Regeneration-Associated Processes.

Diaz-Diaz L, Rodriguez-Villafane A, Garcia-Arraras J Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 9:768783.

PMID: 35155442 PMC: 8826689. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.768783.


A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.

Rinkevich B, Ballarin L, Martinez P, Somorjai I, Ben-Hamo O, Borisenko I Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 97(1):299-325.

PMID: 34617397 PMC: 9292022. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12801.


Molecular Aspects of Regeneration Mechanisms in Holothurians.

Dolmatov I Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(2).

PMID: 33578707 PMC: 7916379. DOI: 10.3390/genes12020250.


Beyond Adult Stem Cells: Dedifferentiation as a Unifying Mechanism Underlying Regeneration in Invertebrate Deuterostomes.

Ferrario C, Sugni M, Somorjai I, Ballarin L Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 8:587320.

PMID: 33195242 PMC: 7606891. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.587320.


Collective Locomotion of Human Cells, Wound Healing and Their Control by Extracts and Isolated Compounds from Marine Invertebrates.

Luparello C, Mauro M, Lazzara V, Vazzana M Molecules. 2020; 25(11).

PMID: 32466475 PMC: 7321354. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25112471.

References
1.
Sebastian C . Tracking down the origin of cancer: metabolic reprogramming as a driver of stemness and tumorigenesis. Crit Rev Oncog. 2014; 19(5):363-82. DOI: 10.1615/critrevoncog.2014011844. View

2.
Wilkie I . Mutable collagenous tissue: overview and biotechnological perspective. Prog Mol Subcell Biol. 2006; 39:221-50. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27683-1_10. View

3.
Frolova L, Dolmatov I . Microscopic anatomy of the digestive system in normal and regenerating specimens of the brittlestar Amphipholis kochii. Biol Bull. 2010; 218(3):303-16. DOI: 10.1086/BBLv218n3p303. View

4.
Mashanov V, Dolmatov I, Heinzeller T . Transdifferentiation in holothurian gut regeneration. Biol Bull. 2005; 209(3):184-93. DOI: 10.2307/3593108. View

5.
Kawamura K, Shiohara M, Kanda M, Fujiwara S . Retinoid X receptor-mediated transdifferentiation cascade in budding tunicates. Dev Biol. 2013; 384(2):343-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.10.004. View