» Articles » PMID: 28752839

Development and Validation of a Novel Clinical Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Assay to Detect JAK2 and PD-L1 Amplification: a Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization Assay for JAK2 and PD-L1 Amplification

Overview
Journal Mod Pathol
Specialty Pathology
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28752839
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 has been reported in multiple types of cancer and is associated with poor outcome, upregulation of PD-L1, and activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. We have developed a novel fluorescence in situ hybridization assay which combines 3 probes mapping to 9p24.1 with a commercial chromosome 9 centromere (CEN9) probe for detection of the JAK2/9p24.1 amplification. JAK2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was compared with array-based comparative genomic hybridization in 34 samples of triple negative breast cancer tumor. By array-based comparative genomic hybridization, 15 had 9p24.1 copy-number gain (logratio>0.3) and 19 were classified as non-gain (logratio≤0.3). Copy-number gain was defined as JAK2/CEN9 ratio ≥1.1 or average JAK2 signals≥3.0. Twelve of 15 samples with copy-number gain by array-based comparative genomic hybridization were also detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eighteen of 19 samples classified as copy-number non-gain by array-based comparative genomic hybridization were concordant by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. The sensitivity and specificity of the fluorescence in situ hybridization assay was 80% and 95%, respectively (P=0.02). The sample with the highest level of amplification by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (logratio=3.6) also scored highest by fluorescence in situ hybridization (ratio=8.2). There was a correlation between the expression of JAK2 and amplification status (Mean 633 vs 393, P=0.02), and there was a trend of association with PD-L1 RNA expression (Mean 46 vs 22, P=0.11). No significant association was observed between PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression and copy-number gain status. In summary, the novel array-based comparative genomic hybridization assay for detection of chromosome 9p24.1 strongly correlates with the detection of copy-number gain by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. In triple negative breast cancer, this biomarker may identify a relevant subset of patients for targeted molecular therapies.

Citing Articles

A bibliometric analysis of research on PD-1/PD-L1 in urinary tract tumors.

Chen Y, Lu X, Peng G, Liu S, Wang M, Hou H Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2390727.

PMID: 39385743 PMC: 11469446. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2390727.


Mapping cancer biology in space: applications and perspectives on spatial omics for oncology.

Lee S, Kim G, Lee J, Lee A, Kwon S Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):26.

PMID: 38291400 PMC: 10826015. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-01941-z.


Rapid visualization of PD-L1 expression level in glioblastoma immune microenvironment via machine learning cascade-based Raman histopathology.

Zhou Q, Guo J, Wang Z, Li J, Chen M, Xu Q J Adv Res. 2023; 65:257-271.

PMID: 38072311 PMC: 11519053. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2023.12.002.


A Forgotten Corner in Cancer Immunotherapy: The Role of Lipids.

Yu Y, Gao L, Wang Y, Xu B, Maswikiti E, Li H Front Oncol. 2021; 11:751086.

PMID: 34722305 PMC: 8551635. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.751086.


The Role of Oncogenes and Redox Signaling in the Regulation of PD-L1 in Cancer.

Glorieux C, Xia X, Huang P Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(17).

PMID: 34503236 PMC: 8431622. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174426.


References
1.
Shaver T, Lehmann B, Beeler J, Li C, Li Z, Jin H . Diverse, Biologically Relevant, and Targetable Gene Rearrangements in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Other Malignancies. Cancer Res. 2016; 76(16):4850-60. PMC: 4987189. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0058. View

2.
Hao Y, Chapuy B, Monti S, Sun H, Rodig S, Shipp M . Selective JAK2 inhibition specifically decreases Hodgkin lymphoma and mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 20(10):2674-83. PMC: 4084704. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3007. View

3.
Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D . High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998; 20(2):207-11. DOI: 10.1038/2524. View

4.
Sabbatino F, Villani V, Yearley J, Deshpande V, Cai L, Konstantinidis I . PD-L1 and HLA Class I Antigen Expression and Clinical Course of the Disease in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 22(2):470-8. PMC: 5296951. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0715. View

5.
Andre F, Job B, Dessen P, Tordai A, Michiels S, Liedtke C . Molecular characterization of breast cancer with high-resolution oligonucleotide comparative genomic hybridization array. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(2):441-51. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1791. View