» Articles » PMID: 28752837

An International Comparison of Retinopathy of Prematurity Grading Performance Within the Benefits of Oxygen Saturation Targeting II Trials

Overview
Journal Eye (Lond)
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28752837
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

PurposeTo investigate whether the observed international differences in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treatment rates within the Benefits of Oxygen Saturation Targeting (BOOST) II trials might have been caused by international variation in ROP disease grading.MethodsGroups of BOOST II trial ophthalmologists in UK, Australia, and New Zealand (ANZ), and an international reference group (INT) used a web based system to grade a selection of RetCam images of ROP acquired during the BOOST II UK trial. Rates of decisions to treat, plus disease grading, ROP stage grading, ROP zone grading, inter-observer variation within groups and intra-observer variation within groups were measured.ResultsForty-two eye examinations were graded. UK ophthalmologists diagnosed treat-requiring ROP more frequently than ANZ ophthalmologists, 13.9 (3.49) compared to 9.4 (4.46) eye examinations, P=0.038. UK ophthalmologists diagnosed plus disease more frequently than ANZ ophthalmologists, 14.1 (6.23) compared to 8.5 (3.24) eye examinations, P=0.021. ANZ ophthalmologists diagnosed stage 2 ROP more frequently than UK ophthalmologists, 20.2 (5.8) compared to 12.7 (7.1) eye examinations, P=0.026. There were no other significant differences in the grading of ROP stage or zone. Inter-observer variation was higher within the UK group than within the ANZ group. Intra-observer variation was low in both groups.ConclusionsWe have found evidence of international variation in the diagnosis of treatment-requiring ROP. Improved standardisation of the diagnosis of treatment-requiring ROP is required. Measures might include improved training in the grading of ROP, using an international approach, and further development of ROP image analysis software.

Citing Articles

Reduction of pathological retinal neovascularization, vessel obliteration, and artery tortuosity by PEDF protein in an oxygen-induced ischemic retinopathy rat model.

Zhao S, Tschulakow A, Karthikeyan S, Wang K, Kochanek S, Schraermeyer U FASEB Bioadv. 2024; 6(9):311-326.

PMID: 39399476 PMC: 11467744. DOI: 10.1096/fba.2024-00059.


P Score: A Reference Image-Based Clinical Grading Scale for Vascular Change in Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Binenbaum G, Stahl A, Coyner A, He J, Ying G, Ostmo S Ophthalmology. 2024; 131(11):1297-1303.

PMID: 38795976 PMC: 11499040. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.05.019.


Implementation of optical coherence tomography in retinopathy of prematurity screening.

Hanif A, Jian Y, Young B, Campbell J Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2024; 35(3):252-259.

PMID: 38205941 PMC: 11034813. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000001030.


Development and validation of an artificial intelligence based screening tool for detection of retinopathy of prematurity in a South Indian population.

Parthasarathy Rao D, Savoy F, Tan J, Fung B, Bopitiya C, Sivaraman A Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1197237.

PMID: 37794964 PMC: 10545957. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1197237.


Multicenter Validation of Deep Learning Algorithm ROP.AI for the Automated Diagnosis of Plus Disease in ROP.

Bai A, Dai S, Hung J, Kirpalani A, Russell H, Elder J Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023; 12(8):13.

PMID: 37578427 PMC: 10431208. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.8.13.


References
1.
Wilson C, Cocker K, Moseley M, Paterson C, Clay S, Schulenburg W . Computerized analysis of retinal vessel width and tortuosity in premature infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(8):3577-85. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1353. View

2.
Chiang M, Keenan J, Starren J, Du Y, Schiff W, Barile G . Accuracy and reliability of remote retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124(3):322-7. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.124.3.322. View

3.
Dhaliwal C, Fleck B, Wright E, Graham C, McIntosh N . Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in Lothian, Scotland, from 1990 to 2004. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008; 93(6):F422-6. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2007.134791. View

4.
Williams S, Wang L, Kane S, Lee T, Weissgold D, Berrocal A . Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: accuracy of expert versus non-expert graders. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 94(3):351-6. PMC: 3711625. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.166348. View

5.
Darlow B, Elder M, Horwood L, Donoghue D, Henderson-Smart D . Does observer bias contribute to variations in the rate of retinopathy of prematurity between centres?. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 36(1):43-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01652.x. View