» Articles » PMID: 28752413

Punctuated Evolution of Viscid Silk in Spider Orb Webs Supported by Mechanical Behavior of Wet Cribellate Silk

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28752413
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The origin of viscid capture silk in orb webs, from cribellate silk-spinning ancestors, is a key innovation correlated with significant diversification of web-building spiders. Ancestral cribellate silk consists of dry nanofibrils surrounding a stiff, axial fiber that adheres to prey through van der Waals interactions, capillary forces, and physical entanglement. In contrast, viscid silk uses chemically adhesive aqueous glue coated onto a highly compliant and extensible flagelliform core silk. The extensibility of the flagelliform fiber accounts for half of the total work of adhesion for viscid silk and is enabled by water in the aqueous coating. Recent cDNA libraries revealed the expression of flagelliform silk proteins in cribellate orb-weaving spiders. We hypothesized that the presence of flagelliform proteins in cribellate silk could have allowed for a gradual shift in mechanical performance of cribellate axial silk, whose effect was masked by the dry nature of its adhesive. We measured supercontraction and mechanical performance of cribellate axial silk, in wet and dry states, for two species of cribellate orb web-weaving spiders to see if water enabled flagelliform silk-like performance. We found that compliance and extensibility of wet cribellate silk increased compared to dry state as expected. However, when compared to other silk types, the response to water was more similar to other web silks, like major and minor ampullate silk, than to viscid silk. These findings support the punctuated evolution of viscid silk mechanical performance.

Citing Articles

From fibres to adhesives: evolution of spider capture threads from web anchors by radical changes in silk gland function.

Wolff J, Ashley L, Schmitt C, Heu C, Denkova D, Jani M J R Soc Interface. 2024; 21(216):20240123.

PMID: 39081115 PMC: 11289648. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0123.


The evolutionary history of cribellate orb-weaver capture thread spidroins.

Correa-Garhwal S, Baker R, Clarke T, Ayoub N, Hayashi C BMC Ecol Evol. 2022; 22(1):89.

PMID: 35810286 PMC: 9270836. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-022-02042-5.


Spidroin profiling of cribellate spiders provides insight into the evolution of spider prey capture strategies.

Kono N, Nakamura H, Mori M, Tomita M, Arakawa K Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):15721.

PMID: 32973264 PMC: 7515903. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72888-6.


Linking properties of an orb-weaving spider's capture thread glycoprotein adhesive and flagelliform fiber components to prey retention time.

Opell B, Burba C, Deva P, Kin M, Rivas M, Elmore H Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(17):9841-9854.

PMID: 31534698 PMC: 6745672. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5525.


Elastic modulus and toughness of orb spider glycoprotein glue.

Opell B, Clouse M, Andrews S PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0196972.

PMID: 29847578 PMC: 5976159. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196972.

References
1.
Liu Y, Sponner A, Porter D, Vollrath F . Proline and processing of spider silks. Biomacromolecules. 2007; 9(1):116-21. DOI: 10.1021/bm700877g. View

2.
Blackledge T, Hayashi C . Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775). J Exp Biol. 2006; 209(Pt 13):2452-61. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02275. View

3.
Perez-Rigueiro J, Elices M, Plaza G, Real J, Guinea G . The effect of spinning forces on spider silk properties. J Exp Biol. 2005; 208(Pt 14):2633-9. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01701. View

4.
Colgin M, Lewis R . Spider minor ampullate silk proteins contain new repetitive sequences and highly conserved non-silk-like "spacer regions". Protein Sci. 1998; 7(3):667-72. PMC: 2143960. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560070315. View

5.
Hayashi C, Lewis R . Molecular architecture and evolution of a modular spider silk protein gene. Science. 2000; 287(5457):1477-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1477. View