» Articles » PMID: 28751785

CTLA4-CD28 Chimera Gene Modification of T Cells Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Hematological Malignancy

Overview
Journal Exp Mol Med
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28751785
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has served as an effective prevention/treatment modality against the relapse of some hematologic tumors, such as chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the therapeutic efficacies of DLI for other types of leukemia, including acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), have been limited thus far. Therefore, we examined whether increasing the reactivity of donor T cells by gene modification could enhance the therapeutic efficacy of DLI in a murine model of ALL. When a CTLA4-CD28 chimera gene (CTC28) in which the intracellular signaling domain of CTLA4 was replaced with the CD28 signaling domain was introduced into CD4 and CD8 T cells in DLI, the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect was significantly increased. This effect was correlated with an increased expansion of donor CD8 T cells in vivo, and the depletion of CD8 T cells abolished this effect. The CD8 T cell expansion and the enhanced GVT effect were dependent on the transduction of both CD4 and CD8 T cells with CTC28, which emphasizes the role of dual modification in this therapeutic effect. The CTC28-transduced T cells that expanded in vivo also exhibited enhanced functionality. Although the potentiation of the GVT effect mediated by the CTC28 gene modification of T cells was accompanied by an increase of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the GVHD was not lethal and was mitigated by treatment with IL-10 gene-modified third-party mesenchymal stem cells. Thus, the combined genetic modification of CD4 and CD8 donor T cells with CTC28 could be a promising strategy for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of DLI.

Citing Articles

Modular pooled discovery of synthetic knockin sequences to program durable cell therapies.

Blaeschke F, Chen Y, Apathy R, Daniel B, Chen A, Chen P Cell. 2023; 186(19):4216-4234.e33.

PMID: 37714135 PMC: 10508323. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.013.


Chimeric non-antigen receptors in T cell-based cancer therapy.

Guo J, Kent A, Davila E J Immunother Cancer. 2021; 9(8).

PMID: 34344725 PMC: 8336119. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002628.


Overview of Cellular Immunotherapies within Transfusion Medicine for the Treatment of Malignant Diseases.

Tesic N, Pozenel P, Svajger U Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(10).

PMID: 34066067 PMC: 8151282. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105120.


Chimeric CTLA4-CD28-CD3z T Cells Potentiate Antitumor Activity Against CD80/CD86-Positive B Cell Malignancies.

Lin S, Cheng L, Ye W, Li S, Zheng D, Qin L Front Immunol. 2021; 12:642528.

PMID: 33868277 PMC: 8050336. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642528.


Gene modification strategies for next-generation CAR T cells against solid cancers.

Tian Y, Li Y, Shao Y, Zhang Y J Hematol Oncol. 2020; 13(1):54.

PMID: 32423475 PMC: 7236186. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-020-00890-6.

References
1.
Qu X, Liu X, Cheng K, Yang R, Zhao R . Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit Th17 cell differentiation by IL-10 secretion. Exp Hematol. 2012; 40(9):761-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2012.05.006. View

2.
Zhou X, Dotti G, Krance R, Martinez C, Naik S, Kamble R . Inducible caspase-9 suicide gene controls adverse effects from alloreplete T cells after haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2015; 125(26):4103-13. PMC: 4481597. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-628354. View

3.
Raiola A, Van Lint M, Valbonesi M, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, Occhini D . Factors predicting response and graft-versus-host disease after donor lymphocyte infusions: a study on 593 infusions. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003; 31(8):687-93. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703883. View

4.
Ngo M, Rooney C, Howard J, Heslop H . Ex vivo gene transfer for improved adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2011; 20(R1):R93-9. PMC: 3095061. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddr102. View

5.
Fowler D . Shared biology of GVHD and GVT effects: potential methods of separation. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005; 57(3):225-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.07.001. View