» Articles » PMID: 28751716

Static Magnetic Field Stimulation Enhances Oligodendrocyte Differentiation and Secretion of Neurotrophic Factors

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 29
PMID 28751716
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cellular-level effects of low/high frequency oscillating magnetic field on excitable cells such as neurons are well established. In contrast, the effects of a homogeneous, static magnetic field (SMF) on Central Nervous System (CNS) glial cells are less investigated. Here, we have developed an in vitro SMF stimulation set-up to investigate the genomic effects of SMF exposure on oligodendrocyte differentiation and neurotrophic factors secretion. Human oligodendrocytes precursor cells (OPCs) were stimulated with moderate intensity SMF (0.3 T) for a period of two weeks (two hours/day). The differential gene expression of cell activity marker (c-fos), early OPC (Olig1, Olig2. Sox10), and mature oligodendrocyte markers (CNP, MBP) were quantified. The enhanced myelination capacity of the SMF stimulated oligodendrocytes was validated in a dorsal root ganglion microfluidics chamber platform. Additionally, the effects of SMF on the gene expression and secretion of neurotrophic factors- BDNF and NT3 was quantified. We also report that SMF stimulation increases the intracellular calcium influx in OPCs as well as the gene expression of L-type channel subunits-CaV1.2 and CaV1.3. Our findings emphasize the ability of glial cells such as OPCs to positively respond to moderate intensity SMF stimulation by exhibiting enhanced differentiation, functionality as well as neurotrophic factor release.

Citing Articles

Neurobiological effects and mechanisms of magnetic fields: a review from 2000 to 2023.

Wang X, Ye Y, Zuo H, Li Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3094.

PMID: 39516768 PMC: 11545338. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18987-9.


Stress-induced c-fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex differentially affects the main residing cell phenotypes.

Aguilar-Delgadillo A, Cruz-Mendoza F, Luquin-de Andais Teh S, Ruvalcaba-Delgadillo Y, Jauregui-Huerta F Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39325.

PMID: 39498004 PMC: 11532284. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39325.


Hypothermia effects on neuronal plasticity post spinal cord injury.

Al-Nashash H, Wong K, All A PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301430.

PMID: 38578715 PMC: 10997101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301430.


Static magnetic fields in regenerative medicine.

Xie W, Song C, Guo R, Zhang X APL Bioeng. 2024; 8(1):011503.

PMID: 38486824 PMC: 10939708. DOI: 10.1063/5.0191803.


CellGO: a novel deep learning-based framework and webserver for cell-type-specific gene function interpretation.

Li P, Wei J, Zhu Y Brief Bioinform. 2023; 25(1).

PMID: 37995133 PMC: 10790717. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad417.


References
1.
Malone M, Gary D, Yang I, Miglioretti A, Houdayer T, Thakor N . Neuronal activity promotes myelination via a cAMP pathway. Glia. 2013; 61(6):843-54. DOI: 10.1002/glia.22476. View

2.
Nakagawa M, Matsuda Y . A strong static-magnetic field alters operant responding by rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 1988; 9(1):25-37. DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250090103. View

3.
Nakamichi N, Ishioka Y, Hirai T, Ozawa S, Tachibana M, Nakamura N . Possible promotion of neuronal differentiation in fetal rat brain neural progenitor cells after sustained exposure to static magnetism. J Neurosci Res. 2009; 87(11):2406-17. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22087. View

4.
Yoo A, Krieger C, Kim S . Process extension and intracellular Ca2+ in cultured murine oligodendrocytes. Brain Res. 1999; 827(1-2):19-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01282-2. View

5.
Schiffer I, Schreiber W, Graf R, Schreiber E, Jung D, Rose D . No influence of magnetic fields on cell cycle progression using conditions relevant for patients during MRI. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003; 24(4):241-50. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10097. View