» Articles » PMID: 28748349

Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor: Evaluation of Reverse Transcription-polymerase Chain Reaction and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization As Ancillary Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

Overview
Journal Virchows Arch
Date 2017 Jul 28
PMID 28748349
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare, biologically aggressive soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain differentiation, most often arising in the abdominal and pelvic cavities of adolescents and young adults with a striking male predominance. Histologically, it is characterized by islands of uniform small round cells in prominent desmoplastic stroma, and it has a polyimmunophenotypic profile, typically expressing WT1 and cytokeratin, desmin, and neural/neuroendocrine differentiation markers to varying degrees. Tumors at other sites and with variant morphology are more rarely described. DSRCT is associated with a recurrent t(11;22)(p13;q12) translocation, leading to the characteristic EWSR1-WT1 gene fusion. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to detect EWSR1 rearrangement, and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to assess for EWSR1-WT1 fusion transcripts are routine diagnostic ancillary tools. We present a large institutional comparative series of FISH and RT-PCR for DSRCT diagnosis. Twenty-six specimens (from 25 patients) histologically diagnosed as DSRCT were assessed for EWSR1 rearrangement and EWSR1-WT1 fusion transcripts. Of these 26 specimens, 24 yielded positive results with either FISH or RT-PCR or both. FISH was performed in 23 samples, with EWSR1 rearrangement seen in 21 (91.3%). RT-PCR was performed in 18 samples, of which 13 (72.2%) harbored EWSR1-WT1 fusion transcripts. The sensitivity of FISH in detecting DSRCT was 91.3%, and that of RT-PCR was 92.8% following omission of four technical failures. Therefore, both methods are comparable in terms of sensitivity. FISH is more sensitive if technical failures for RT-PCR are taken into account, and RT-PCR is more specific in confirming DSRCT. Both methods complement each other by confirming cases that the other method may not. In isolation, FISH is a relatively non-specific diagnostic adjunct due to the number of different neoplasms that can harbor EWSR1 rearrangement, such as Ewing sarcoma. However, in cases with appropriate morphology and a typical pattern of immunostaining, FISH is confirmatory of the diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Prognostic factors of desmoplastic small round cell tumor in children and adolescents: a population-based study.

Wu D, Zhao L, Liao Z, Luo L, Yao X Pediatr Surg Int. 2025; 41(1):84.

PMID: 39992542 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-025-05987-y.


Adamantinoma-like ewing sarcoma arising in the pancreatic tail: a case report of a rare entity and review of the literature.

Wang Z, Wen X, Zhang Y, Zhang X Diagn Pathol. 2023; 18(1):86.

PMID: 37518334 PMC: 10388509. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-023-01374-0.


Intra-Abdominal Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (DSRCT) and the Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): A Review.

Reijers S, Siew C, Kok N, Honore C, van Houdt W Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(4):3951-3963.

PMID: 37185412 PMC: 10136577. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040299.


Molecular classification of soft tissue sarcomas for adequate diagnosis: A study on the northeast population of Morocco.

El Koubaiti R, Mazti A, Maaroufi M, El Idrissi M, El Ibrahimi A, El Mrini A Heliyon. 2022; 8(9):e10673.

PMID: 36164527 PMC: 9508571. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10673.


Primary desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the submandibular gland: a case report and literature review.

Zhou J, Li Q, Luo B, Fu X, Ou C, Gao X Diagn Pathol. 2022; 17(1):6.

PMID: 34996495 PMC: 8742402. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-021-01183-3.


References
1.
Cliteur V, Szuhai K, Baelde H, van Dam J, Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn P . Paratesticular desmoplastic small round cell tumour: an unusual tumour with an unusual fusion; cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis combining RT-PCR and COBRA-FISH. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2012; 2(1):3. PMC: 3351707. DOI: 10.1186/2045-3329-2-3. View

2.
Chan A, MacNeill S, Thorner P, Squire J, Zielenska M . Variant EWS-WT1 chimeric product in the desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 1999; 2(2):188-92. DOI: 10.1007/s100249900108. View

3.
Thway K, Fisher C . Tumors with EWSR1-CREB1 and EWSR1-ATF1 fusions: the current status. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012; 36(7):e1-e11. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31825485c5. View

4.
Su M, Jeng Y, Chu Y . Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the kidney. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28(10):1379-83. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000128676.64288.0f. View

5.
Wang L, Perlman E, Vujanic G, Zuppan C, Brundler M, Cheung C . Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the kidney in childhood. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007; 31(4):576-84. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213432.14740.14. View