» Articles » PMID: 28743638

Efficient 3D-CTF Correction for Cryo-electron Tomography Using NovaCTF Improves Subtomogram Averaging Resolution to 3.4Å

Overview
Journal J Struct Biol
Date 2017 Jul 27
PMID 28743638
Citations 130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) allows cellular ultrastructures and macromolecular complexes to be imaged in three-dimensions in their native environments. Cryo-electron tomograms are reconstructed from projection images taken at defined tilt-angles. In order to recover high-resolution information from cryo-electron tomograms, it is necessary to measure and correct for the contrast transfer function (CTF) of the microscope. Most commonly, this is performed using protocols that approximate the sample as a two-dimensional (2D) plane. This approximation accounts for differences in defocus and therefore CTF across the tilted sample. It does not account for differences in defocus of objects at different heights within the sample; instead, a 3D approach is required. Currently available approaches for 3D-CTF correction are computationally expensive and have not been widely implemented. Here we simulate the benefits of 3D-CTF correction for high-resolution subtomogram averaging, and present a user-friendly, computationally-efficient 3D-CTF correction tool, NovaCTF, that is compatible with standard tomogram reconstruction workflows in IMOD. We validate the approach on synthetic data and test it using subtomogram averaging of real data. Consistent with our simulations, we find that 3D-CTF correction allows high-resolution structures to be obtained with much smaller subtomogram averaging datasets than are required using 2D-CTF. We also show that using equivalent dataset sizes, 3D-CTF correction can be used to obtain higher-resolution structures. We present a 3.4Å resolution structure determined by subtomogram averaging.

Citing Articles

The conserved HIV-1 spacer peptide 2 triggers matrix lattice maturation.

Stacey J, Hrebik D, Nand E, Shetty S, Qu K, Boicu M Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 40011770 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08624-9.


TomoCPT: a generalizable model for 3D particle detection and localization in cryo-electron tomograms.

Shah P, Sanchez-Garcia R, Stuart D Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2025; 81(Pt 2):63-76.

PMID: 39902808 PMC: 11804251. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798325000865.


Protocol for estimating the contrast transfer function and absolute tilt angle offset for cryo-electron tomography using CTFMeasure.

Zhang R, Shen Y, Li X STAR Protoc. 2025; 6(1):103550.

PMID: 39847488 PMC: 11795557. DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103550.


Architecture of the Sap S-layer of revealed by integrative structural biology.

Sogues A, Leigh K, Halingstad E, Van der Verren S, Cecil A, Fioravanti A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(51):e2415351121.

PMID: 39652757 PMC: 11665858. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2415351121.


A cryo-electron tomography study of ciliary rootlet organization.

van Hoorn C, Carter A Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39641991 PMC: 11623930. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.91642.


References
1.
Forster F, Hegerl R . Structure determination in situ by averaging of tomograms. Methods Cell Biol. 2007; 79:741-67. DOI: 10.1016/S0091-679X(06)79029-X. View

2.
Fernandez J, Li S, Crowther R . CTF determination and correction in electron cryotomography. Ultramicroscopy. 2006; 106(7):587-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.02.004. View

3.
Rohou A, Grigorieff N . CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol. 2015; 192(2):216-21. PMC: 6760662. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. View

4.
Kazantsev I, Klukowska J, Herman G, Cernetic L . Fully three-dimensional defocus-gradient corrected backprojection in cryoelectron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2010; 110(9):1128-42. PMC: 2912958. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.04.002. View

5.
Mindell J, Grigorieff N . Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2003; 142(3):334-47. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-8477(03)00069-8. View