Genes, Cells, and Biobanks: Yes, There's Still a Consent Problem

Overview

Journal PLoS Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2017 Jul 26

PMID 28742850

Citations 42

Authors

Timothy Caulfield

Blake Murdoch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

From a research perspective, the interest in biobanking continues to intensify. Governments and industry have invested heavily in biobanks, as exemplified by initiatives like the United Kingdom Biobank and United States' Precision Medicine Initiative. But despite this enthusiasm, many profound legal and ethical challenges remain unresolved. Indeed, there continues to be disagreements about how best to obtain consent and the degree and nature of control that research participants retain over donated samples and health information. Emerging social trends-including concerns about commercialization and perceived rights of continuing control ("biorights")-seem likely to intensify these issues.

Citing Articles

Identifying High-Priority Ethical Challenges for Precision Emergency Medicine: Nominal Group Study.

Rose C, Shearer E, Woller I, Foster A, Ashenburg N, Kim I JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e68371.

PMID: 39916376 PMC: 11825900. DOI: 10.2196/68371.

Ethical, Legal, and Practical Concerns Surrounding the Implemention of New Forms of Consent for Health Data Research: Qualitative Interview Study.

Wiertz S, Boldt J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e52180.

PMID: 39110970 PMC: 11339564. DOI: 10.2196/52180.

Sculpting the future: A narrative review of 3D printing in plastic surgery and prosthetic devices.

Zahid M, Mavani P, Awuah W, Alabdulrahman M, Punukollu R, Kundu A Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(6):e2205.

PMID: 38915353 PMC: 11194296. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2205.

Efficient Use of Biological Data in the Web 3.0 Era by Applying Nonfungible Token Technology.

Wang G, Chen C, Jiang Z, Li G, Wu C, Li S J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e46160.

PMID: 38805706 PMC: 11167317. DOI: 10.2196/46160.

Perception of Polish patients with cancer of the ethical and legal issues related to biobank research.

Domaradzki J, Czekajewska J, Walkowiak D Oncologist. 2024; 29(7):e887-e898.

PMID: 38666716 PMC: 11224992. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae078.

References

De Vries R, Tomlinson T, Kim H, Krenz C, Haggerty D, Ryan K . Understanding the Public's Reservations about Broad Consent and Study-By-Study Consent for Donations to a Biobank: Results of a National Survey. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0159113. PMC: 4944938. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159113. View

Caulfield T, Burningham S, Joly Y, Master Z, Shabani M, Borry P . A review of the key issues associated with the commercialization of biobanks. J Law Biosci. 2014; 1(1):94-110. PMC: 5033518. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lst004. View

Ogbogu U, Toews M, Ollenberger A, Borry P, Nobile H, Bergmann M . Newspaper coverage of biobanks. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e500. PMC: 4121587. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.500. View

Garrison N, Sathe N, Matheny Antommaria A, Holm I, Sanderson S, Smith M . A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States. Genet Med. 2015; 18(7):663-71. PMC: 4873460. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.138. View

Smith J, Birkeland A, Goldman E, Brenner J, Carey T, Spector-Bagdady K . Immortal Life of the Common Rule: Ethics, Consent, and the Future of Cancer Research. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(17):1879-1883. PMC: 5791844. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.4522. View

Wauters A, Van Hoyweghen I . Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review. J Hum Genet. 2016; 61(4):275-82. DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. View

Kulynych J, Greely H . Clinical genomics, big data, and electronic medical records: reconciling patient rights with research when privacy and science collide. J Law Biosci. 2017; 4(1):94-132. PMC: 5570692. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsw061. View

Aitken M, de St Jorre J, Pagliari C, Jepson R, Cunningham-Burley S . Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Ethics. 2016; 17(1):73. PMC: 5103425. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x. View

Kondylakis H, Koumakis L, Hanold S, Nwankwo I, Forgo N, Marias K . Donor's support tool: Enabling informed secondary use of patient's biomaterial and personal data. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 97:282-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.019. View

10.

DAbramo F, Schildmann J, Vollmann J . Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis. BMC Med Ethics. 2015; 16:60. PMC: 4563851. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0053-5. View

11.

Greely H . To the barricades!. Am J Bioeth. 2010; 10(9):1-2. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.494229. View

12.

Hallinan D, Friedewald M . Open consent, biobanking and data protection law: can open consent be 'informed' under the forthcoming data protection regulation?. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2015; 11:1. PMC: 4480798. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-014-0020-9. View

13.

Budin-Ljosne I, Teare H, Kaye J, Beck S, Bentzen H, Caenazzo L . Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research. BMC Med Ethics. 2017; 18(1):4. PMC: 5264333. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9. View

14.

Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K . Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(12):2128-34. PMC: 2775766. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.157099. View

15.

Haga S, Barry W, Mills R, Ginsburg G, Svetkey L, Sullivan J . Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013; 17(4):327-35. PMC: 3609633. DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0350. View

16.

Cunningham J, Zanzi M, Willebrand M, Ekselius L, Ramklint M . No regrets: Young adult patients in psychiatry report positive reactions to biobank participation. BMC Psychiatry. 2017; 17(1):21. PMC: 5240261. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1199-0. View

17.

Ogbogu U, Burningham S, Ollenberger A, Calder K, Du L, El Emam K . Policy recommendations for addressing privacy challenges associated with cell-based research and interventions. BMC Med Ethics. 2014; 15:7. PMC: 3914710. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-7. View

18.

Siminoff L, Wilson-Genderson M, Mosavel M, Barker L, Trgina J, Traino H . Confidentiality in Biobanking Research: A Comparison of Donor and Nondonor Families' Understanding of Risks. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017; 21(3):171-177. PMC: 5367914. DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0407. View

19.

Kaye J, Whitley E, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K . Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 23(2):141-6. PMC: 4130658. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. View

20.

Parkman A, Foland J, Anderson B, Duquette D, Sobotka H, Lynn M . Public awareness of genetic nondiscrimination laws in four states and perceived importance of life insurance protections. J Genet Couns. 2014; 24(3):512-21. PMC: 4702480. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9771-y. View