» Articles » PMID: 28741252

Serial Recall of Colors: Two Models of Memory for Serial Order Applied to Continuous Visual Stimuli

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 Jul 26
PMID 28741252
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the effects of serial position and temporal distinctiveness on serial recall of simple visual stimuli. Participants observed lists of five colors presented at varying, unpredictably ordered interitem intervals, and their task was to reproduce the colors in their order of presentation by selecting colors on a continuous-response scale. To control for the possibility of verbal labeling, articulatory suppression was required in one of two experimental sessions. The predictions were derived through simulation from two computational models of serial recall: SIMPLE represents the class of temporal-distinctiveness models, whereas SOB-CS represents event-based models. According to temporal-distinctiveness models, items that are temporally isolated within a list are recalled more accurately than items that are temporally crowded. In contrast, event-based models assume that the time intervals between items do not affect recall performance per se, although free time following an item can improve memory for that item because of extended time for the encoding. The experimental and the simulated data were fit to an interference measurement model to measure the tendency to confuse items with other items nearby on the list-the locality constraint-in people as well as in the models. The continuous-reproduction performance showed a pronounced primacy effect with no recency, as well as some evidence for transpositions obeying the locality constraint. Though not entirely conclusive, this evidence favors event-based models over a role for temporal distinctiveness. There was also a strong detrimental effect of articulatory suppression, suggesting that verbal codes can be used to support serial-order memory of simple visual stimuli.

Citing Articles

Perceptual stimuli with novel bindings interfere with visual working memory.

Shepherdson P Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021; 83(8):3086-3103.

PMID: 34476762 PMC: 8550721. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02359-1.

References
1.
Sense F, Morey C, Prince M, Heathcote A, Morey R . Opportunity for verbalization does not improve visual change detection performance: A state-trace analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2016; 49(3):853-862. PMC: 5429385. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0741-1. View

2.
Farrell S, Lewandowsky S . An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002; 9(1):59-79. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196257. View

3.
Oberauer K, Stoneking C, Wabersich D, Lin H . Hierarchical Bayesian measurement models for continuous reproduction of visual features from working memory. J Vis. 2017; 17(5):11. DOI: 10.1167/17.5.11. View

4.
Ricker T, Cowan N . Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: a matter of working memory consolidation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013; 40(2):417-28. PMC: 4056671. DOI: 10.1037/a0034301. View

5.
Brainard D . The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):433-6. View