» Articles » PMID: 28738854

Understanding Clinician Attitudes Towards Implementation of Guided Self-help Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Those Who Hear Distressing Voices: Using Factor Analysis to Test Normalisation Process Theory

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2017 Jul 26
PMID 28738854
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) has been used to understand the implementation of physical health care interventions. The current study aims to apply the NPT model to a secondary mental health context, and test the model using exploratory factor analysis. This study will consider the implementation of a brief cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (CBTp) intervention.

Methods: Mental health clinicians were asked to complete a NPT-based questionnaire on the implementation of a brief CBTp intervention. All clinicians had experience of either working with the target client group or were able to deliver psychological therapies. In total, 201 clinicians completed the questionnaire.

Results: The results of the exploratory factor analysis found partial support for the NPT model, as three of the NPT factors were extracted: (1) coherence, (2) cognitive participation, and (3) reflexive monitoring. We did not find support for the fourth NPT factor (collective action). All scales showed strong internal consistency. Secondary analysis of these factors showed clinicians to generally support the implementation of the brief CBTp intervention.

Conclusions: This study provides strong evidence for the validity of the three NPT factors extracted. Further research is needed to determine whether participants' level of seniority moderates factor extraction, whether this factor structure can be generalised to other healthcare settings, and whether pre-implementation attitudes predict actual implementation outcomes.

Citing Articles

Current trends in e-mental health interventions: Health care providers' attitudes and usage patterns.

Weitzel E, Schladitz K, Schwenke M, Welzel F, Schomerus G, Schonknecht P Internet Interv. 2025; 39:100808.

PMID: 39991729 PMC: 11847231. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100808.


Representation of Voice Hearing Groups by French Mental Health Professionals.

Renaud E, Arthur B, Typhaine K, Clementine R, Juan-Pablo R Community Ment Health J. 2023; 60(3):572-580.

PMID: 37976007 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01209-8.


Sequential mixed method evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis stepped care.

Kopelovich S, Maura J, Blank J, Lockwood G BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1322.

PMID: 36335319 PMC: 9636669. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08725-5.


Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review.

May C, Cummings A, Girling M, Bracher M, Mair F, May C Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):80.

PMID: 29879986 PMC: 5992634. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1.


Using normalisation process theory to evaluate the implementation of a complex intervention to embed the surgical safety checklist.

Gillespie B, Harbeck E, Lavin J, Gardiner T, Withers T, Marshall A BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):170.

PMID: 29523148 PMC: 5845378. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2973-5.

References
1.
. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005; 39(1-2):1-30. DOI: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01516.x. View

2.
Tavakol M, Dennick R . Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2016; 2:53-55. PMC: 4205511. DOI: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. View

3.
Kataoka S, Zhang L, Wells K . Unmet need for mental health care among U.S. children: variation by ethnicity and insurance status. Am J Psychiatry. 2002; 159(9):1548-55. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1548. View

4.
May C, Mair F, Dowrick C, Finch T . Process evaluation for complex interventions in primary care: understanding trials using the normalization process model. BMC Fam Pract. 2007; 8:42. PMC: 1950872. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-42. View

5.
Lindell M, WHITNEY D . Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001; 86(1):114-21. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114. View