» Articles » PMID: 28729729

A Novel Methodology Using CT Imaging Biomarkers to Quantify Radiation Sensitivity in the Esophagus with Application to Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 22
PMID 28729729
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Personalized cancer therapy seeks to tailor treatment to an individual patient's biology. Therefore, a means to characterize radiosensitivity is necessary. In this study, we investigated radiosensitivity in the normal esophagus using an imaging biomarker of radiation-response and esophageal toxicity, esophageal expansion, as a method to quantify radiosensitivity in 134 non-small-cell lung cancer patients, by using K-Means clustering to group patients based on esophageal radiosensitivity. Patients within the cluster of higher response and lower dose were labelled as radiosensitive. This information was used as a variable in toxicity prediction modelling (lasso logistic regression). The resultant model performance was quantified and compared to toxicity prediction modelling without utilizing radiosensitivity information. The esophageal expansion-response was highly variable between patients, even for similar radiation doses. K-Means clustering was able to identify three patient subgroups of radiosensitivity: radiosensitive, radio-normal, and radioresistant groups. Inclusion of the radiosensitive variable improved lasso logistic regression models compared to model performance without radiosensitivity information. Esophageal radiosensitivity can be quantified using esophageal expansion and K-Means clustering to improve toxicity prediction modelling. Finally, this methodology may be applied in clinical trials to validate pre-treatment biomarkers of esophageal toxicity.

Citing Articles

Performance Comparison of 10 State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Algorithms for Outcome Prediction Modeling of Radiation-Induced Toxicity.

Salazar R, Nair S, Leone A, Xu T, Mumme R, Duryea J Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024; 10(2):101675.

PMID: 39717195 PMC: 11665468. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101675.


Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy.

Bang C, Bernard G, Le W, Lalonde A, Kadoury S, Bahig H Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023; 39:100590.

PMID: 36935854 PMC: 10014342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100590.


Early Prediction of Acute Esophagitis for Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Alam S, Zhang P, Zhang S, Chen I, Rimner A, Tyagi N Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021; 110(3):883-892.

PMID: 33453309 PMC: 8180486. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.007.


Predicting spatial esophageal changes in a multimodal longitudinal imaging study via a convolutional recurrent neural network.

Wang C, Alam S, Zhang S, Hu Y, Nadeem S, Tyagi N Phys Med Biol. 2020; 65(23):235027.

PMID: 33245052 PMC: 8956374. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb1d9.


A Nomogram for the Prediction of Progression and Overall Survival in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Zhang D, Cheng Y, Fan J, Yao J, Zhao Z, Jiang Y Front Oncol. 2020; 10:1550.

PMID: 32984014 PMC: 7477348. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01550.


References
1.
Rattay T, Talbot C . Finding the genetic determinants of adverse reactions to radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014; 26(5):301-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.02.001. View

2.
Bentzen S, Constine L, Deasy J, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks L . Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76(3 Suppl):S3-9. PMC: 3431964. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040. View

3.
Hamburg M, Collins F . The path to personalized medicine. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(4):301-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304. View

4.
Bruner D, Movsas B, Konski A, Roach M, Bondy M, Scarintino C . Outcomes research in cancer clinical trial cooperative groups: the RTOG model. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13(6):1025-41. DOI: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000031335.02254.3b. View

5.
Kelsey C, Jackson L, Langdon S, Owzar K, Hubbs J, Vujaskovic Z . A polymorphism within the promoter of the TGFβ1 gene is associated with radiation sensitivity using an objective radiologic endpoint. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 82(2):e247-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.064. View