» Articles » PMID: 28725387

Origins of Two Hemiclonal Hybrids Among Three Species (Teleostei: Hexagrammidae): Genetic Diversification Through Host Switching

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2017 Jul 21
PMID 28725387
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two natural, hemiclonal hybrid strains were discovered in three species. The natural hybrids, all of which were females that produced haploid eggs containing only the genome (maternal ancestor; hereafter ), generated F hybrid-type offspring by fertilization with haploid sperm of or (paternal species; and , respectively). This study was performed to clarify the extent of diversification between the two hybrids and the maternal ancestor. Genealogical analysis using mtDNA revealed that all 38 / hybrids formed a branch (Branch I) with 18 of the 33 / hybrids. No haplotype sharing was observed with the maternal ancestor. Further, microsatellite DNA analysis suggested that the members of Branch I shared the same hemiclonal genome set. The results suggested that / hybrids originated by anomalous hybridization, or "host switching," between / and , and not from interspecific hybridization between and . The remaining 9 of 11 / haplotypes and all of the 27 haplotypes were mixed within the genealogical tree, as if they had originated from multiple mutations. However, / could also mate with . Although offspring from this host switch (Backcross-) have the same genome as normal , a part of their genome retains genetic factors capable of producing hemiclones. Consequently, when a descendant of a BC- hybrid mates with males, a new hemiclone lineage will arise. Multiple haplotype revival through host switching from a single mutation in hybrids is another possible hypothesis for the observed mixing of / haplotypes within the mtDNA genealogical tree.

Citing Articles

Gradual chromosomal lagging drive programmed genome elimination in hemiclonal fishes from the genus Hypseleotris.

Dedukh D, Majtanova Z, Rab P, Ezaz T, Unmack P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26866.

PMID: 39501046 PMC: 11538498. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78278-6.


A robust system of hybridogenesis that increases genetic variability and promotes evolutionary succession in greenlings (Teleostei: Hexagrammidae, genus Hexagrammos): Regeneration of a new hemiclonal lineage.

Suzuki S, Yoshida S, Aratani M, Kimura-Kawaguchi M, Munehara H PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0304772.

PMID: 38829848 PMC: 11146738. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304772.


Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes.

Dedukh D, Krasikova A Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021; 97(1):195-216.

PMID: 34542224 PMC: 9292451. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12796.


Uniparental Genome Elimination in Australian Carp Gudgeons.

Majtanova Z, Dedukh D, Choleva L, Adams M, Rab P, Unmack P Genome Biol Evol. 2021; 13(6).

PMID: 33591327 PMC: 8245195. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab030.


Using asexual vertebrates to study genome evolution and animal physiology: Banded () x Common Killifish () hybrid lineages as a model system.

Dalziel A, Tirbhowan S, Drapeau H, Power C, Jonah L, Gbotsyo Y Evol Appl. 2020; 13(6):1214-1239.

PMID: 32684956 PMC: 7359844. DOI: 10.1111/eva.12975.


References
1.
Stamatakis A . RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(21):2688-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. View

2.
Tanabe A . Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 11(5):914-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03021.x. View

3.
Hedges S, Bogart J, Maxson L . Ancestry of unisexual salamanders. Nature. 1992; 356(6371):708-10. DOI: 10.1038/356708a0. View

4.
Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View

5.
Crow K, Kanamoto Z, Bernardi G . Molecular phylogeny of the hexagrammid fishes using a multi-locus approach. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004; 32(3):986-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.03.012. View