» Articles » PMID: 28725103

Will I Fit in and Do Well? The Importance of Social Belongingness and Self-Efficacy for Explaining Gender Differences in Interest in STEM and HEED Majors

Overview
Journal Sex Roles
Date 2017 Jul 21
PMID 28725103
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Throughout the world, the labor market is clearly gender segregated. More research is needed to explain women's lower interest in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) majors and particularly to explain men's lower interest in HEED (Health care, Elementary Education, and the Domestic spheres) majors. We tested self-efficacy (competence beliefs) and social belongingness expectations (fitting in socially) as mediators of gender differences in interest in STEM and HEED majors in a representative sample of 1327 Swedish high school students. Gender differences in interest in STEM majors strongly related to women's lower self-efficacy for STEM careers and, to a lesser degree, to women's lower social belongingness expectations with students in STEM majors. Social belongingness expectations also partly explained men's lower interest in HEED majors, but self-efficacy was not an important mediator of gender differences in interest in HEED. These results imply that interventions designed to lessen gender segregation in the labor market need to focus more on the social belongingness of students in the gender minority. Further, to specifically increase women's interest in STEM majors, we need to counteract gender stereotypical competence beliefs and assure women that they have what it takes to handle STEM careers.

Citing Articles

Psychological dynamics of overqualification: career anxiety and decision commitment in STEM.

Khan A, Soomro M, Khan N, Bodla A BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):686.

PMID: 39578864 PMC: 11583426. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02061-5.


Perceived belonging on campus predicts depression among heavy drinkers: A test of three moderators.

Chavez S, Hall N, Tomkins M, DiBello A, Neighbors C, Carey K J Am Coll Health. 2023; :1-8.

PMID: 37856456 PMC: 11026301. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2266037.


"Programming Is Not That Hard!" When a Science Center Visit Increases Young Women's Programming Ability Beliefs.

Tellhed U, Bjorklund F, Kallio Strand K, Schottelndreier K J STEM Educ Res. 2023; :1-23.

PMID: 37359319 PMC: 10159224. DOI: 10.1007/s41979-023-00094-w.


Mind the gender gap: The social neuroscience of belonging.

Rippon G Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1094830.

PMID: 37091814 PMC: 10116861. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1094830.


Language and gender: Computerized text analyses predict gender ratios from organizational descriptions.

Stille L, Sikstrom S, Lindqvist A, Renstrom E, Gustafsson Senden M Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1020614.

PMID: 36698572 PMC: 9869037. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1020614.


References
1.
Somerville L . Special issue on the teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014; 22(2):121-127. PMC: 3992953. DOI: 10.1177/0963721413476512. View

2.
Bandura A . Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2):191-215. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. View

3.
Else-Quest N, Hyde J, Linn M . Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(1):103-127. DOI: 10.1037/a0018053. View

4.
Good C, Rattan A, Dweck C . Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 102(4):700-17. DOI: 10.1037/a0026659. View

5.
Eagly A, Karau S . Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev. 2002; 109(3):573-98. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573. View