» Articles » PMID: 28717151

What Drives Sound Symbolism? Different Acoustic Cues Underlie Sound-size and Sound-shape Mappings

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 19
PMID 28717151
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sound symbolism refers to the non-arbitrary mappings that exist between phonetic properties of speech sounds and their meaning. Despite there being an extensive literature on the topic, the acoustic features and psychological mechanisms that give rise to sound symbolism are not, as yet, altogether clear. The present study was designed to investigate whether different sets of acoustic cues predict size and shape symbolism, respectively. In two experiments, participants judged whether a given consonant-vowel speech sound was large or small, round or angular, using a size or shape scale. Visual size judgments were predicted by vowel formant F1 in combination with F2, and by vowel duration. Visual shape judgments were, however, predicted by formants F2 and F3. Size and shape symbolism were thus not induced by a common mechanism, but rather were distinctly affected by acoustic properties of speech sounds. These findings portray sound symbolism as a process that is not based merely on broad categorical contrasts, such as round/unround and front/back vowels. Rather, individuals seem to base their sound-symbolic judgments on specific sets of acoustic cues, extracted from speech sounds, which vary across judgment dimensions.

Citing Articles

Crossmodal correspondences between visual and speech angularity and tactile jaggedness of response key.

Suzuki Y, Ueno N, Nakahashi K, Nagai M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27806.

PMID: 39537859 PMC: 11561357. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79400-4.


PHONETIC UNDERPINNINGS OF SOUND SYMBOLISM ACROSS MULTIPLE DOMAINS OF MEANING.

Lacey S, Matthews K, Sathian K, Nygaard L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282365 PMC: 11398306. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.610970.


DIFFERENTIAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE SPECTRO-TEMPORAL AND VOCAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AUDITORY PSEUDOWORDS TO MULTIPLE SOUND-SYMBOLIC MAPPINGS.

Lacey S, Matthews K, Hoffmann A, Sathian K, Nygaard L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39282266 PMC: 11398405. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.610973.


Front Is High and Back Is Low: Sound-Space Iconicity in Finnish.

Vainio L, Kilpelainen M, Wikstrom A, Vainio M Lang Speech. 2023; 67(4):1001-1019.

PMID: 38054421 PMC: 11583518. DOI: 10.1177/00238309231214176.


The maluma/takete effect is late: No longitudinal evidence for shape sound symbolism in the first year.

Sidhu D, Athanasopoulou A, Archer S, Czarnecki N, Curtin S, Pexman P PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0287831.

PMID: 37943758 PMC: 10635456. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287831.


References
1.
Bremner A, Caparos S, Davidoff J, de Fockert J, Linnell K, Spence C . "Bouba" and "Kiki" in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition. 2012; 126(2):165-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.007. View

2.
Parise C, Spence C . Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 220(3-4):319-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3140-6. View

3.
Lockwood G, Dingemanse M . Iconicity in the lab: a review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1246. PMC: 4547014. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01246. View

4.
Ma W, Thompson W . Human emotions track changes in the acoustic environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(47):14563-8. PMC: 4664334. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515087112. View

5.
Walker L, Walker P . Cross-sensory mapping of feature values in the size-brightness correspondence can be more relative than absolute. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015; 42(1):138-50. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000128. View