» Articles » PMID: 28716965

Neural Tuning to Low-Level Features of Speech Throughout the Perisylvian Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jul 19
PMID 28716965
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite a large body of research, we continue to lack a detailed account of how auditory processing of continuous speech unfolds in the human brain. Previous research showed the propagation of low-level acoustic features of speech from posterior superior temporal gyrus toward anterior superior temporal gyrus in the human brain (Hullett et al., 2016). In this study, we investigate what happens to these neural representations past the superior temporal gyrus and how they engage higher-level language processing areas such as inferior frontal gyrus. We used low-level sound features to model neural responses to speech outside of the primary auditory cortex. Two complementary imaging techniques were used with human participants (both males and females): electrocorticography (ECoG) and fMRI. Both imaging techniques showed tuning of the perisylvian cortex to low-level speech features. With ECoG, we found evidence of propagation of the temporal features of speech sounds along the ventral pathway of language processing in the brain toward inferior frontal gyrus. Increasingly coarse temporal features of speech spreading from posterior superior temporal cortex toward inferior frontal gyrus were associated with linguistic features such as voice onset time, duration of the formant transitions, and phoneme, syllable, and word boundaries. The present findings provide the groundwork for a comprehensive bottom-up account of speech comprehension in the human brain. We know that, during natural speech comprehension, a broad network of perisylvian cortical regions is involved in sound and language processing. Here, we investigated the tuning to low-level sound features within these regions using neural responses to a short feature film. We also looked at whether the tuning organization along these brain regions showed any parallel to the hierarchy of language structures in continuous speech. Our results show that low-level speech features propagate throughout the perisylvian cortex and potentially contribute to the emergence of "coarse" speech representations in inferior frontal gyrus typically associated with high-level language processing. These findings add to the previous work on auditory processing and underline a distinctive role of inferior frontal gyrus in natural speech comprehension.

Citing Articles

Spatiotemporal Mapping of Auditory Onsets during Speech Production.

Kurteff G, Field A, Asghar S, Tyler-Kabara E, Clarke D, Weiner H J Neurosci. 2024; 44(47).

PMID: 39455254 PMC: 11580786. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1109-24.2024.


Processing of auditory feedback in perisylvian and insular cortex.

Kurteff G, Field A, Asghar S, Tyler-Kabara E, Clarke D, Weiner H bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38798574 PMC: 11118286. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.14.593257.


Brain Source Correlates of Speech Perception and Reading Processes in Children With and Without Reading Difficulties.

Azaiez N, Loberg O, Hamalainen J, Leppanen P Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:921977.

PMID: 35928008 PMC: 9344064. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.921977.


A 10-hour within-participant magnetoencephalography narrative dataset to test models of language comprehension.

Armeni K, Guclu U, van Gerven M, Schoffelen J Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):278.

PMID: 35676293 PMC: 9177538. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01382-7.


Open multimodal iEEG-fMRI dataset from naturalistic stimulation with a short audiovisual film.

Berezutskaya J, Vansteensel M, Aarnoutse E, Freudenburg Z, Piantoni G, Branco M Sci Data. 2022; 9(1):91.

PMID: 35314718 PMC: 8938409. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01173-0.


References
1.
McGurk H, Macdonald J . Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 1976; 264(5588):746-8. DOI: 10.1038/264746a0. View

2.
Arai T, Pavel M, Hermansky H, Avendano C . Syllable intelligibility for temporally filtered LPC cepstral trajectories. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 105(5):2783-91. DOI: 10.1121/1.426895. View

3.
Fu Q, Shannon R . Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(1):589-97. DOI: 10.1121/1.428325. View

4.
Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dupoux E, Gout A . Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: a cross-linguistic study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000; 12(4):635-47. DOI: 10.1162/089892900562390. View

5.
Giraud A, Lorenzi C, Ashburner J, Wable J, Johnsrude I, Frackowiak R . Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(3):1588-98. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1588. View