» Articles » PMID: 28713470

Differences in Anthropometry, Biological Age and Physical Fitness Between Young Elite Kayakers and Canoeists

Overview
Journal J Hum Kinet
Publisher Termedia
Date 2017 Jul 18
PMID 28713470
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the anthropometric and physical characteristics of youth elite paddlers and to identify the differences between kayakers and canoeists. A total of 171 male paddlers (eighty-nine kayakers and eighty-two canoeists), aged 13.69 ± 0.57 years (mean ± SD) volunteered to participate in this study. The participants completed basic anthropometric assessments (body mass, stretch stature, sitting height, body mass index, maturity level, sum of 6 skinfolds and fat mass percentage) as well as a battery of physical fitness tests (overhead medicine ball throw, counter movement jump, sit-and-reach and 20 m multi-stage shuttle run tests). The anthropometric results revealed a significantly larger body size (stretch stature and sitting height) and body mass in the kayakers (p < 0.01) as well as a more mature biological status (p = 0.003). The physical fitness level exhibited by the kayakers was likewise significantly greater than that of the canoeists, both in the counter movement jump and estimated VO2max (p < 0.05), as well as in the overhead medicine ball throw and sit-and-reach test (p < 0.01). These findings confirm the more robust and mature profile of youth kayakers that might be associated with the superior fitness level observed and the specific requirements of this sport discipline.

Citing Articles

Influence of biological maturation status on selected anthropometric and physical fitness variables in adolescent male volleyball players.

Albaladejo-Saura M, Vaquero-Cristobal R, Garcia-Roca J, Esparza-Ros F PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13216.

PMID: 35402095 PMC: 8992641. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13216.


The Effect of Age, Biological Maturation and Birth Quartile in the Kinanthropometric and Physical Fitness Differences between Male and Female Adolescent Volleyball Players.

Albaladejo-Saura M, Vaquero-Cristobal R, Garcia-Roca J, Esparza-Ros F Children (Basel). 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 35053683 PMC: 8774601. DOI: 10.3390/children9010058.


Anthropometric and fitness normative values for young karatekas.

Martinez-de-Quel O, Alegre L, Castillo-Garcia A, Ayan C Biol Sport. 2021; 38(3):351-357.

PMID: 34475618 PMC: 8329972. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.99324.


The Importance of Biological Maturation and Years of Practice in Kayaking Performance.

Fernandes R, Lopez-Plaza D, Correas-Gomez L, Gomes B, Alacid F Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16).

PMID: 34444072 PMC: 8392238. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168322.


Relationship between Biological Maturation, Physical Fitness, and Kinanthropometric Variables of Young Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Albaladejo-Saura M, Vaquero-Cristobal R, Gonzalez-Galvez N, Esparza-Ros F Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(1).

PMID: 33466291 PMC: 7795393. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010328.

References
1.
Tesch P, Piehl K, Wilson G, Karlsson J . Physiological investigations of Swedish elite canoe competitors. Med Sci Sports. 1976; 8(4):214-8. View

2.
Muyor J, Vaquero-Cristobal R, Alacid F, Lopez-Minarro P . Criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach and toe-touch tests as a measure of hamstring extensibility in athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 28(2):546-55. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b54fb. View

3.
Latt E, Jurimae J, Maestu J, Purge P, Ramson R, Haljaste K . Physiological, biomechanical and anthropometrical predictors of sprint swimming performance in adolescent swimmers. J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 9(3):398-404. PMC: 3761703. View

4.
Fry R, Morton A . Physiological and kinanthropometric attributes of elite flatwater kayakists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991; 23(11):1297-301. View

5.
van Someren K, Palmer G . Prediction of 200-m sprint kayaking performance. Can J Appl Physiol. 2003; 28(4):505-17. DOI: 10.1139/h03-039. View