» Articles » PMID: 28707250

Genomic Prediction of Starch Content and Chipping Quality in Tetraploid Potato Using Genotyping-by-sequencing

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Genetics
Date 2017 Jul 15
PMID 28707250
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic prediction models for starch content and chipping quality show promising results, suggesting that genomic selection is a feasible breeding strategy in tetraploid potato. Genomic selection uses genome-wide molecular markers to predict performance of individuals and allows selections in the absence of direct phenotyping. It is regarded as a useful tool to accelerate genetic gain in breeding programs, and is becoming increasingly viable for crops as genotyping costs continue to fall. In this study, we have generated genomic prediction models for starch content and chipping quality in tetraploid potato to facilitate varietal development. Chipping quality was evaluated as the colour of a potato chip after frying following cold induced sweetening. We used genotyping-by-sequencing to genotype 762 offspring, derived from a population generated from biparental crosses of 18 tetraploid parents. Additionally, 74 breeding clones were genotyped, representing a test panel for model validation. We generated genomic prediction models from 171,859 single-nucleotide polymorphisms to calculate genomic estimated breeding values. Cross-validated prediction correlations of 0.56 and 0.73 were obtained within the training population for starch content and chipping quality, respectively, while correlations were lower when predicting performance in the test panel, at 0.30-0.31 and 0.42-0.43, respectively. Predictions in the test panel were slightly improved when including representatives from the test panel in the training population but worsened when preceded by marker selection. Our results suggest that genomic prediction is feasible, however, the extremely high allelic diversity of tetraploid potato necessitates large training populations to efficiently capture the genetic diversity of elite potato germplasm and enable accurate prediction across the entire spectrum of elite potatoes. Nonetheless, our results demonstrate that GS is a promising breeding strategy for tetraploid potato.

Citing Articles

Genomic prediction for potato (Solanum tuberosum) quality traits improved through image analysis.

Yusuf M, Miller M, Stefaniak T, Haagenson D, Endelman J, Thompson A Plant Genome. 2024; 17(4):e20507.

PMID: 39256988 PMC: 11628938. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20507.


To be or not to be tetraploid-the impact of marker ploidy on genomic prediction and GWAS of potato.

Aalborg T, Nielsen K Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1386837.

PMID: 39139728 PMC: 11319270. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1386837.


QTL discovery for agronomic and quality traits in diploid potato clones using PotatoMASH amplicon sequencing.

Vexler L, Leyva-Perez M, Konkolewska A, Clot C, Byrne S, Griffin D G3 (Bethesda). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39028844 PMC: 11457057. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae164.


Genotyping-by-sequencing targets genic regions and improves resolution of genome-wide association studies in autotetraploid potato.

Sharma S, McLean K, Hedley P, Dale F, Daniels S, Bryan G Theor Appl Genet. 2024; 137(8):180.

PMID: 38980417 PMC: 11233353. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-024-04651-8.


Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of the α-Amylase () Gene Family in Potato.

Duan Y, Jin L Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(6).

PMID: 38927729 PMC: 11202818. DOI: 10.3390/genes15060793.


References
1.
Lin Z, Cogan N, Pembleton L, Spangenberg G, Forster J, Hayes B . Genetic Gain and Inbreeding from Genomic Selection in a Simulated Commercial Breeding Program for Perennial Ryegrass. Plant Genome. 2016; 9(1). DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.06.0046. View

2.
Slater A, Wilson G, Cogan N, Forster J, Hayes B . Improving the analysis of low heritability complex traits for enhanced genetic gain in potato. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 127(4):809-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2258-7. View

3.
Talbert P, Henikoff S . Centromeres convert but don't cross. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8(3):e1000326. PMC: 2834710. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000326. View

4.
Goddard M, Hayes B . Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet. 2007; 124(6):323-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x. View

5.
Sallam A, Endelman J, Jannink J, Smith K . Assessing Genomic Selection Prediction Accuracy in a Dynamic Barley Breeding Population. Plant Genome. 2020; 8(1):eplantgenome2014.05.0020. DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2014.05.0020. View