Efficacy of Home-based Non-pharmacological Interventions for Treating Depression: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To systematically review and compare the efficacy of all available home-based non-pharmacological treatments of depression.
Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Data Sources: Medline, Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were searched since inceptions to 7 August 2016.
Eligibility Criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of home-based non-pharmacological interventions with usual care of patients with depression were included in the review.
Main Outcomes: Depression symptom scores and disease remission rates at the end of treatment.
Results: Seventeen studies were included in the review. Home-based non-pharmacological interventions were categorised as (1) home-based psychological intervention, (2) home-based exercise intervention, (3) combined home-based psychological intervention with exercise intervention and (4) complementary medicine. Complementary medicine approaches were excluded from the meta-analysis due to heterogeneity. The standardised mean differences of post-treatment depression symptom scores between usual care groups and home-based psychological intervention, home-based exercise intervention and combined home-based psychological intervention with exercise intervention were âˆ'0.57 (95% CI âˆ'0.84 to âˆ'0.31), âˆ'1.03 (95% CI âˆ'2.89 to 0.82) and âˆ'0.78 (95% CI âˆ'1.09 to âˆ'0.47), respectively. These results suggest that only home-based psychological intervention and combined home-based psychological intervention with exercise intervention could significantly decrease depression scores. Compared with usual care groups, the disease remission rate was also significantly higher for home-based psychological intervention (pooled risk ratio=1.53; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.98) and combined home-based psychological intervention with exercise intervention (pooled risk ratio=3.47; 95% CI 2.11 to 5.70). Of all the studied interventions, combined home-based psychological intervention with exercise intervention had the highest probability of resulting in disease remission.
Conclusion: Our study confirms the efficacy of home-based psychological intervention and combined home-based psychological intervention with exercise intervention in the treatment of depression. Combined home-based psychological intervention and exercise intervention was the best treatment and should be considered for inclusion in clinical guidelines for managing depression.
Huntsman D, Bulaj G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(2).
PMID: 40003451 PMC: 11855921. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22020225.
Fu Y, Song Y, Li Y, Sanchez-Vidana D, Jiaqi Zhang J, Lau W Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20189.
PMID: 39215203 PMC: 11364622. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71213-9.
Immersive Technologies for Depression Care: Scoping Review.
Mahony Reategui-Rivera C, Villarreal-Zegarra D, De la Cruz-Torralva K, Diaz-Sanchez P, Finkelstein J JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e56056.
PMID: 38663004 PMC: 11082738. DOI: 10.2196/56056.
Soltani Z, Parizad N, Radfar M, Alinejad V, Arzanlo M, Haghighi M BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):231.
PMID: 38539144 PMC: 10967041. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05688-1.
Hao X, Jia Y, Chen J, Zou C, Jiang C Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023; 19:2149-2169.
PMID: 37867932 PMC: 10588757. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S425509.