» Articles » PMID: 28703199

Tundra Uptake of Atmospheric Elemental Mercury Drives Arctic Mercury Pollution

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 14
PMID 28703199
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anthropogenic activities have led to large-scale mercury (Hg) pollution in the Arctic. It has been suggested that sea-salt-induced chemical cycling of Hg (through 'atmospheric mercury depletion events', or AMDEs) and wet deposition via precipitation are sources of Hg to the Arctic in its oxidized form (Hg(ii)). However, there is little evidence for the occurrence of AMDEs outside of coastal regions, and their importance to net Hg deposition has been questioned. Furthermore, wet-deposition measurements in the Arctic showed some of the lowest levels of Hg deposition via precipitation worldwide, raising questions as to the sources of high Arctic Hg loading. Here we present a comprehensive Hg-deposition mass-balance study, and show that most of the Hg (about 70%) in the interior Arctic tundra is derived from gaseous elemental Hg (Hg(0)) deposition, with only minor contributions from the deposition of Hg(ii) via precipitation or AMDEs. We find that deposition of Hg(0)-the form ubiquitously present in the global atmosphere-occurs throughout the year, and that it is enhanced in summer through the uptake of Hg(0) by vegetation. Tundra uptake of gaseous Hg(0) leads to high soil Hg concentrations, with Hg masses greatly exceeding the levels found in temperate soils. Our concurrent Hg stable isotope measurements in the atmosphere, snowpack, vegetation and soils support our finding that Hg(0) dominates as a source to the tundra. Hg concentration and stable isotope data from an inland-to-coastal transect show high soil Hg concentrations consistently derived from Hg(0), suggesting that the Arctic tundra might be a globally important Hg sink. We suggest that the high tundra soil Hg concentrations might also explain why Arctic rivers annually transport large amounts of Hg to the Arctic Ocean.

Citing Articles

Assessing mercury exposure to water and fish of the Mackenzie watershed using a Bayesian network analysis.

Jermilova U, Kirk J, Moe S, Landis W, Sharpe E, McGovern M Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025; 21(2):396-413.

PMID: 39970384 PMC: 11844342. DOI: 10.1093/inteam/vjae011.


Oceanic evasion fuels Arctic summertime rebound of atmospheric mercury and drives transport to Arctic terrestrial ecosystems.

Huang S, Yuan T, Song Z, Chang R, Peng D, Zhang P Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):903.

PMID: 39837904 PMC: 11750971. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56300-3.


Atmospheric Hg(0) dry deposition over environmental surfaces: Insights from mercury isotope fractionation.

Liu Y, Liu H, Guo Y, Lu D, Hou X, Shi J Eco Environ Health. 2024; 3(4):543-555.

PMID: 39605969 PMC: 11599991. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2024.04.009.


Near surface oxidation of elemental mercury leads to mercury exposure in the Arctic Ocean biota.

Lim S, Kim Y, Motta L, Yang E, Rhee T, Hong J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7598.

PMID: 39217169 PMC: 11365953. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51852-2.


Geographic Drivers of Mercury Entry into Aquatic Food Webs Revealed by Mercury Stable Isotopes in Dragonfly Larvae.

Janssen S, Kotalik C, Willacker J, Tate M, Flanagan Pritz C, Nelson S Environ Sci Technol. 2024; .

PMID: 39012137 PMC: 11295128. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c02436.


References
1.
Krabbenhoft D, Sunderland E . Environmental science. Global change and mercury. Science. 2013; 341(6153):1457-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1242838. View

2.
Obrist D, Pokharel A, Moore C . Vertical profile measurements of soil air suggest immobilization of gaseous elemental mercury in mineral soil. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(4):2242-52. DOI: 10.1021/es4048297. View

3.
Amos H, Sonke J, Obrist D, Robins N, Hagan N, Horowitz H . Observational and modeling constraints on global anthropogenic enrichment of mercury. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(7):4036-47. DOI: 10.1021/es5058665. View

4.
Selin N . Global change and mercury cycling: challenges for implementing a global mercury treaty. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013; 33(6):1202-10. DOI: 10.1002/etc.2374. View

5.
Dastoor A, Durnford D . Arctic Ocean: is it a sink or a source of atmospheric mercury?. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 48(3):1707-17. DOI: 10.1021/es404473e. View