» Articles » PMID: 28702401

Outcome of HER2 Testing by FISH Applying ASCO/CAP 2007 and 2013 Guideline in IHC Equivocal Group of Breast Cancer: Experience at Tertiary Cancer Care Centre

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Jul 14
PMID 28702401
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: HER2 testing guideline of ASCO/CAP for interpretation and reporting has recently been revised. The study is aimed to measure the impact of 2013 CAP guideline on equivocal HER2 test outcome (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 2+) when tested by fluorescent hybridization (FISH). The study also aims at finding the frequency of polysomy and monosomy of chromosome 17.

Materials And Methods: Specimens were collected in Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India. IHC was performed in every case, and FISH was performed in IHC2+ cases.

Results: In final analysis includes 557 subjects on the basis of CAP guideline 2007 and CAP guideline 2013. One hundred ninety-two subjects (34.4%) were HER2 amplified according to CAP scoring 2007, and 246 subjects (44%) according to 2013 CAP scoring.

Conclusions: FISH results were evaluated (IHC2 + interpreted according to CAP 2007 guideline) with both 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP scoring criteria, we identified significantly more HER2 positive cases as compared to cases evaluated using the 2007 criteria ( < 0.05). We also found that in breast carcinoma, HER2 status in the presence of polysomy 17 may vary with the scoring criteria used. Evaluation of FISH result using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria means that more patients with breast cancer may be appropriate for targeted treatment with trastuzumab, potentially improving their outcome.

Citing Articles

Clinico-pathological Features of Mutation in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer of Indian Population.

Saikia K, Panigrahi M, Mehta A, Kumar D Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018; 9(3):381-386.

PMID: 30288002 PMC: 6154351. DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0749-3.


Immunohistochemistry and alternative FISH testing in breast cancer with HER2 equivocal amplification.

Agersborg S, Mixon C, Nguyen T, Aithal S, Sudarsanam S, Blocker F Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 170(2):321-328.

PMID: 29564742 PMC: 5999182. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4755-5.

References
1.
Rosenberg C . Polysomy 17 and HER-2 amplification: true, true, and unrelated. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(30):4856-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2684. View

2.
Paterson M, Dietrich K, Danyluk J, Paterson A, Lees A, Jamil N . Correlation between c-erbB-2 amplification and risk of recurrent disease in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1991; 51(2):556-67. View

3.
Vanden Bempt I, Van Loo P, Drijkoningen M, Neven P, Smeets A, Christiaens M . Polysomy 17 in breast cancer: clinicopathologic significance and impact on HER-2 testing. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(30):4869-74. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4296. View

4.
Hyun C, Lee H, Kim K, Kim S, Kim J, Choe G . The effect of chromosome 17 polysomy on HER-2/neu status in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2007; 61(3):317-21. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2007.050336. View

5.
Watters A, Going J, Cooke T, Bartlett J . Chromosome 17 aneusomy is associated with poor prognostic factors in invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003; 77(2):109-14. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021399923825. View