» Articles » PMID: 28701531

Differential Contributions to the Interception of Occluded Ballistic Trajectories by the Temporoparietal Junction, Area HMT/V5+, and the Intraparietal Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2017 Jul 14
PMID 28701531
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to catch objects when transiently occluded from view suggests their motion can be extrapolated. Intraparietal cortex (IPS) plays a major role in this process along with other brain structures, depending on the task. For example, interception of objects under Earth's gravity effects may depend on time-to-contact predictions derived from integration of visual signals processed by hMT/V5+ with a priori knowledge of gravity residing in the temporoparietal junction (TPJ). To investigate this issue further, we disrupted TPJ, hMT/V5+, and IPS activities with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while subjects intercepted computer-simulated projectile trajectories perturbed randomly with either hypo- or hypergravity effects. In , trajectories were occluded either 750 or 1,250 ms before landing. Three subject groups underwent triple-pulse TMS (tpTMS, 3 pulses at 10 Hz) on one target area (TPJ | hMT/V5+ | IPS) and on the vertex (control site), timed at either trajectory perturbation or occlusion. In , trajectories were entirely visible and participants received tpTMS on TPJ and hMT/V5+ with same timing as tpTMS of TPJ, hMT/V5+, and IPS affected differently the interceptive timing. TPJ stimulation affected preferentially responses to 1-g motion, hMT/V5+ all response types, and IPS stimulation induced opposite effects on 0-g and 2-g responses, being ineffective on 1-g responses. Only IPS stimulation was effective when applied after target disappearance, implying this area might elaborate memory representations of occluded target motion. Results are compatible with the idea that IPS, TPJ, and hMT/V5+ contribute to distinct aspects of visual motion extrapolation, perhaps through parallel processing. Visual extrapolation represents a potential neural solution to afford motor interactions with the environment in the face of missing information. We investigated relative contributions by temporoparietal junction (TPJ), hMT/V5+, and intraparietal cortex (IPS), cortical areas potentially involved in these processes. Parallel organization of visual extrapolation processes emerged with respect to the target's motion causal nature: TPJ was primarily involved for visual motion congruent with gravity effects, IPS for arbitrary visual motion, whereas hMT/V5+ contributed at earlier processing stages.

Citing Articles

Computational account for the naturalness perception of others' jumping motion based on a vertical projectile motion model.

Yokosaka T, Ujitoko Y, Kawabe T Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2031):rspb20241490.

PMID: 39288810 PMC: 11407856. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1490.


rTMS over the human medial parietal cortex impairs online reaching corrections.

Breveglieri R, Borgomaneri S, Bosco A, Filippini M, De Vitis M, Tessari A Brain Struct Funct. 2023; 229(2):297-310.

PMID: 38141108 PMC: 10917872. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-023-02735-7.


Interception of vertically approaching objects: temporal recruitment of the internal model of gravity and contribution of optical information.

Delle Monache S, Paolocci G, Scalici F, Conti A, Lacquaniti F, Indovina I Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1266332.

PMID: 38046950 PMC: 10690631. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1266332.


Rhythmic tapping to a moving beat motion kinematics overrules natural gravity.

Perez O, Delle Monache S, Lacquaniti F, Bosco G, Merchant H iScience. 2023; 26(9):107543.

PMID: 37744410 PMC: 10517406. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107543.


Neural Aspects of Prospective Control through Resonating Taus in an Interceptive Timing Task.

Van der Weel F, Sokolovskis I, Raja V, Van der Meer A Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552196 PMC: 9776417. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121737.


References
1.
Soechting J, Flanders M . Extrapolation of visual motion for manual interception. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 99(6):2956-67. DOI: 10.1152/jn.90308.2008. View

2.
Beudel M, Renken R, Leenders K, de Jong B . Cerebral representations of space and time. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):1032-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.028. View

3.
Kaas A, Weigelt S, Roebroeck A, Kohler A, Muckli L . Imagery of a moving object: the role of occipital cortex and human MT/V5+. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(1):794-804. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.055. View

4.
Eskandar E, Assad J . Dissociation of visual, motor and predictive signals in parietal cortex during visual guidance. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(1):88-93. DOI: 10.1038/4594. View

5.
Shuwairi S, Curtis C, Johnson S . Neural substrates of dynamic object occlusion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(8):1275-85. PMC: 3133772. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1275. View