» Articles » PMID: 28701290

Using New and Emerging Technologies to Identify and Respond to Suicidality Among Help-Seeking Young People: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2017 Jul 14
PMID 28701290
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Suicidal thoughts are common among young people presenting to face-to-face and online mental health services. The early detection and rapid response to these suicidal thoughts and other suicidal behaviors is a priority for suicide prevention and early intervention efforts internationally. Establishing how best to use new and emerging technologies to facilitate person-centered systematic assessment and early intervention for suicidality is crucial to these efforts.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the use of a suicidality escalation protocol to respond to suicidality among help-seeking young people.

Methods: A total of 232 young people in the age range of 16-25 years were recruited from either a primary mental health care service or online in the community. Each young person used the Synergy Online System and completed an initial clinical assessment online before their face-to-face or online clinical appointment. A suicidality escalation protocol was used to identify and respond to current and previous suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Results: A total of 153 young people (66%, 153/232) reported some degree of suicidality and were provided with a real-time alert online. Further levels of escalation (email or phone contact and clinical review) were initiated for the 35 young people (15%, 35/232) reporting high suicidality. Higher levels of psychological distress (P<.001) and a current alcohol or substance use problem (P=.02) predicted any level of suicidality compared with no suicidality. Furthermore, predictors of high suicidality compared with low suicidality were higher levels of psychological distress (P=.01), psychosis-like symptoms in the last 12 months (P=.01), a previous mental health problem (P=.01), and a history of suicide planning or attempts (P=.001).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the use of new and emerging technologies to facilitate the systematic assessment and detection of help-seeking young people presenting with suicidality. This protocol empowered the young person by suggesting pathways to care that were based on their current needs. The protocol also enabled an appropriate and timely response from service providers for young people reporting high suicidality that was associated with additional comorbid issues, including psychosis-like symptoms, and a history of suicide plans and attempts.

Citing Articles

A Digital Approach for Addressing Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors in Youth Mental Health Services: Observational Study.

Chong M, Hickie I, Ottavio A, Rogers D, Dimitropoulos G, LaMonica H J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e60879.

PMID: 39693140 PMC: 11694056. DOI: 10.2196/60879.


The Impact of a Digital Referral Platform to Improve Access to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: A Prospective Observational Study with Real-World Data.

Neiva Ganga R, Santa K, Ali M, Smith G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(10).

PMID: 39457291 PMC: 11506971. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21101318.


Incorporating Complexity and System Dynamics into Economic Modelling for Mental Health Policy and Planning.

Crosland P, Marshall D, Hosseini S, Ho N, Vacher C, Skinner A Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(12):1301-1315.

PMID: 39354214 PMC: 11564312. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01434-3.


Help-Seeking Needs Related to Suicide Prevention for Individuals in Contact With Mental Health Services: A Rapid Scoping Review.

Shin H, Kemp J, Groves S, Bennett-Poynter L, Pape C, Lascelles K J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024; 32(1):217-241.

PMID: 39244728 PMC: 11705000. DOI: 10.1111/jpm.13102.


Perceptions of mental health providers of the barriers and facilitators of using and engaging youth in digital mental-health-enabled measurement based care.

Bassi E, Bright K, Norman L, Pintson K, Daniel S, Sidhu S Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241253093.

PMID: 38726214 PMC: 11080807. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241253093.


References
1.
Saunders J, Aasland O, Babor T, De la Fuente J, Grant M . Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993; 88(6):791-804. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x. View

2.
Kobak K, Greist J, Jefferson J, Katzelnick D . Computer-administered clinical rating scales. A review. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996; 127(4):291-301. DOI: 10.1007/s002130050089. View

3.
Hagnell O, Lanke J, Rorsman B . Suicide rates in the Lundby study: mental illness as a risk factor for suicide. Neuropsychobiology. 1981; 7(5):248-53. DOI: 10.1159/000117857. View

4.
Caldwell T, Jorm A, Dear K . Suicide and mental health in rural, remote and metropolitan areas in Australia. Med J Aust. 2004; 181(S7):S10-4. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06348.x. View

5.
Passos I, Mwangi B, Cao B, Hamilton J, Wu M, Zhang X . Identifying a clinical signature of suicidality among patients with mood disorders: A pilot study using a machine learning approach. J Affect Disord. 2016; 193:109-16. PMC: 4744514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.066. View