» Articles » PMID: 28698908

[Adult Autopsies During the Past Decade in Germany : Data from Two University Hospitals]

Overview
Journal Pathologe
Specialty Pathology
Date 2017 Jul 13
PMID 28698908
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The clinical autopsy is the ultimate medical service for a patient and plays a crucial role in the education of physicians and other medical personnel, as well as in the context of quality control. Nevertheless, the number of autopsies is constantly decreasing. Numerous factors, such as the personal attitude of relatives and also clarification of relatives, as well as the increasing application of imaging methods while the patient is still alive, play a central role in this decline.

Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the development of autopsy services over the past decade in two university hospitals in Germany and therefore to underline the importance of this investigation procedure in pathology.

Material And Methods: Autopsy reports between the years 2005 and 2014 from 2 university institutes of pathology were analyzed regarding a diverse dataset, including age and sex of the deceased as well as the clinical and pathological causes of death.

Results: The data showed that the number of autopsies has continuously decreased over the past decade; however, the distribution of characteristics of the deceased remained relatively stable. In this cohort the clinically assumed cause of death differed from the pathological cause of death in 6% of the autopsies. Frequently occurring discrepant diagnoses were cardiac tamponade, aortic dissection and endocarditis/myocarditis.

Discussion: Our results show that, despite significant improvements in imaging methods, findings do not yield more accurate results than does autopsy. This underscores once again the need to encourage the performance of this final medical act on patients.

Citing Articles

Autopsy rates and diagnostic errors in a Swiss community hospital: a ten-year retrospective analysis.

Hagen C, Eriksson U, Schmid K, Flury R, Bode P Virchows Arch. 2025; .

PMID: 40038125 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-025-04060-2.


[Development and progress of the National Autopsy Network (NATON)].

Windeck S, Allgoewer K, von Stillfried S, Triefenbach L, Nienaber U, Bulow R Pathologie (Heidelb). 2024; 45(3):203-210.

PMID: 38427066 PMC: 11045591. DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01307-8.


Cause of Death in Patients in Radiation Oncology.

Domschikowski J, Koch K, Schmalz C Front Oncol. 2021; 11:763629.

PMID: 34746005 PMC: 8566939. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.763629.


Implementation of modern tools in autopsy practice-the way towards contemporary postmortal diagnostics.

Langer R, Trohler A, Schnuriger B, Trippel M, Blank A, Banz Y Virchows Arch. 2018; 474(2):149-158.

PMID: 30426205 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2482-2.


Post-Mortem Examination as a Quality Improvement Instrument.

Wittekind C, Gradistanac T Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018; 115(39):653-658.

PMID: 30375329 PMC: 6224542. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0653.


References
1.
Kirch W, Schafii C . Misdiagnosis at a university hospital in 4 medical eras. Medicine (Baltimore). 1996; 75(1):29-40. DOI: 10.1097/00005792-199601000-00004. View

2.
Krukemeyer M, v d Driesch C, Dankof A, Krenn V, Hansen D, Dietel M . [Necessity of increasing autopsy frequency following the introduction of DRGs]. Pathologe. 2006; 28(4):294-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00292-006-0846-x. View

3.
Bauer T, Potratz D, Goller T, Wagner A, Schafer R . [Quality control by autopsy. How often do the postmortem examination findings correct the clinical diagnosis?]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1991; 116(21):801-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1063681. View

4.
Ma J, Ward E, Siegel R, Jemal A . Temporal Trends in Mortality in the United States, 1969-2013. JAMA. 2015; 314(16):1731-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.12319. View

5.
Shojania K, Burton E, McDonald K, Goldman L . Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003; 289(21):2849-56. DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.21.2849. View