» Articles » PMID: 28698553

Efficient Characterization and Classification of Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Aging

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 13
PMID 28698553
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), delineating contrast sensitivity over a wide range of spatial frequencies, provides a comprehensive characterization of spatial vision and a sensitive test for many physiological and pathological processes. A precise CSF measurement tool for the aging population is of great theoretical and practical importance. In the current study, we tested whether the assumptions of the newly developed quick CSF method were valid and whether it can rapidly, reliably, and effectively evaluate CSFs in the aging population. The quick CSF method combines Bayesian adaptive inference with an information gain strategy to directly estimate four parameters that define the observer's CSF. Eighteen young and twenty-five old observers participated in the evaluation of the quick CSF method. All observers were screened for ophthalmological and mental diseases. Our results showed that the CSFs derived from the quick CSF method well matched with those from the traditional Ψ method, with excellent test-retest reliability. More importantly, the quick CSF method can accurately detect the difference of CSFs between the young and old groups. Aging significantly degrades contrast sensitivity. The quick CSF method demonstrates great potentials for both laboratory research and clinical applications in the aging population.

Citing Articles

Using Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling to Enhance Statistical Inference on Contrast Sensitivity.

Zhao Y, Lesmes L, Dorr M, Lu Z Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(12):17.

PMID: 39666355 PMC: 11645744. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.12.17.


Update on Clinical Trial Endpoints in Gene Therapy Trials for Inherited Retinal Diseases.

Igoe J, Lam B, Gregori N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336999 PMC: 11431936. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185512.


Assessing the contrast sensitivity function in myopic parafovea: A quick contrast sensitivity functions study.

Xu Z, Zhuang Y, Chen Z, Hou F, Chan L, Feng L Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:971009.

PMID: 36278008 PMC: 9582454. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.971009.


Active Learning to Characterize the Full Contrast Sensitivity Function in Cataracts.

Vingopoulos F, Kasetty M, Garg I, Silverman R, Katz R, Vasan R Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:3109-3118.

PMID: 36168557 PMC: 9509679. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S367490.


Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of contrast sensitivity functions in a within-subject design.

Zhao Y, Lesmes L, Hou F, Lu Z J Vis. 2021; 21(12):9.

PMID: 34792537 PMC: 8606820. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.12.9.


References
1.
Li X, Lu Z, Xu P, Jin J, Zhou Y . Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors. J Neurosci Methods. 2003; 130(1):9-18. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(03)00174-2. View

2.
CAMPBELL F, Green D . Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965; 181(3):576-93. PMC: 1357668. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. View

3.
Billino J, Bremmer F, Gegenfurtner K . Differential aging of motion processing mechanisms: evidence against general perceptual decline. Vision Res. 2008; 48(10):1254-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.014. View

4.
Nameda N, Kawara T, Ohzu H . Human visual spatio-temporal frequency performance as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci. 1989; 66(11):760-5. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198911000-00007. View

5.
Betts L, Sekuler A, Bennett P . The effects of aging on orientation discrimination. Vision Res. 2007; 47(13):1769-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.016. View