» Articles » PMID: 28693467

Predicting RNA Hyper-editing with a Novel Tool when Unambiguous Alignment is Impossible

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2017 Jul 12
PMID 28693467
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Repetitive elements are now known to have relevant cellular functions, including self-complementary sequences that form double stranded (ds) RNA. There are numerous pathways that determine the fate of endogenous dsRNA, and misregulation of endogenous dsRNA is a driver of autoimmune disease, particularly in the brain. Unfortunately, the alignment of high-throughput, short-read sequences to repeat elements poses a dilemma: Such sequences may align equally well to multiple genomic locations. In order to differentiate repeat elements, current alignment methods depend on sequence variation in the reference genome. Reads are discarded when no such variations are present. However, RNA hyper-editing, a possible fate for dsRNA, introduces enough variation to distinguish between repeats that are otherwise identical.

Results: To take advantage of this variation, we developed a new algorithm, RepProfile, that simultaneously aligns reads and predicts novel variations. RepProfile accurately aligns hyper-edited reads that other methods discard. In particular we predict hyper-editing of Drosophila melanogaster repeat elements in vivo at levels previously described only in vitro, and provide validation by Sanger sequencing sixty-two individual cloned sequences. We find that hyper-editing is concentrated in genes involved in cell-cell communication at the synapse, including some that are associated with neurodegeneration. We also find that hyper-editing tends to occur in short runs.

Conclusions: Previous studies of RNA hyper-editing discarded ambiguously aligned reads, ignoring hyper-editing in long, perfect dsRNA - the perfect substrate for hyper-editing. We provide a method that simulation and Sanger validation show accurately predicts such RNA editing, yielding a superior picture of hyper-editing.

References
1.
Jin P, Duan R, Qurashi A, Qin Y, Tian D, Rosser T . Pur alpha binds to rCGG repeats and modulates repeat-mediated neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neuron. 2007; 55(4):556-64. PMC: 1994817. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.020. View

2.
Lee H, Cording A, Vielmetter J, Zinn K . Interactions between a receptor tyrosine phosphatase and a cell surface ligand regulate axon guidance and glial-neuronal communication. Neuron. 2013; 78(5):813-26. PMC: 3683152. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.001. View

3.
Rodriguez J, Menet J, Rosbash M . Nascent-seq indicates widespread cotranscriptional RNA editing in Drosophila. Mol Cell. 2012; 47(1):27-37. PMC: 3409466. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.002. View

4.
Mannion N, Greenwood S, Young R, Cox S, Brindle J, Read D . The RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1 controls innate immune responses to RNA. Cell Rep. 2014; 9(4):1482-94. PMC: 4542304. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.041. View

5.
Kim M, Semple I, Kim B, Kiers A, Nam S, Park H . Drosophila Gyf/GRB10 interacting GYF protein is an autophagy regulator that controls neuron and muscle homeostasis. Autophagy. 2015; 11(8):1358-72. PMC: 4590642. DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1063766. View