» Articles » PMID: 28691102

DCE-MRI Texture Features for Early Prediction of Breast Cancer Therapy Response

Overview
Journal Tomography
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Jul 11
PMID 28691102
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of hundreds of texture features extracted from voxel-based dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parametric maps for early prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In total, 38 patients with breast cancer underwent DCE-MRI before (baseline) and after the first of the 6-8 NAC cycles. Quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and semiquantitative metrics were estimated from DCE-MRI time-course data. The residual cancer burden (RCB) index value was computed based on pathological analysis of surgical specimens after NAC completion. In total, 1043 texture features were extracted from each of the 13 parametric maps of quantitative PK or semiquantitative metric, and their capabilities for early prediction of RCB were examined by correlating feature changes between the 2 MRI studies with RCB. There were 1069 pairs of feature-map combinations that showed effectiveness for response prediction with 4 correlation coefficients >0.7. The 3-dimensional gray-level cooccurrence matrix was the most effective feature extraction method for therapy response prediction, and, in general, the statistical features describing texture heterogeneity were the most effective features. Quantitative PK parameters, particularly those estimated with the shutter-speed model, were more likely to generate effective features for prediction response compared with the semiquantitative metrics. The best feature-map pair could predict pathologic complete response with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity using our cohort. In conclusion, breast tumor heterogeneity in microvasculature as measured by texture features of voxel-based DCE-MRI parametric maps could be a useful biomarker for early prediction of NAC response.

Citing Articles

Initial experience in implementing quantitative DCE-MRI to predict breast cancer therapy response in a multi-center and multi-vendor platform setting.

Moloney B, Li X, Hirano M, Saad Eddin A, Lim J, Biswas D Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1395502.

PMID: 39678499 PMC: 11638047. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1395502.


Deconvolution-Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Improve the Prediction of Pathological Information of Breast Cancer.

Zhang L, Fan M, Li L J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(1):13-24.

PMID: 38343210 PMC: 10976965. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00915-9.


Segmentation of cellular ultrastructures on sparsely labeled 3D electron microscopy images using deep learning.

Machireddy A, Thibault G, Loftis K, Stoltz K, Bueno C, Smith H Front Bioinform. 2024; 3:1308708.

PMID: 38162124 PMC: 10754953. DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1308708.


Exploring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Predictive Models, Radiomic, and Pathological Markers in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Elsayed B, Alksas A, Shehata M, Mahmoud A, Zaky M, Alghandour R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(21).

PMID: 37958461 PMC: 10648987. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215288.


Longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI radiomic models for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer.

Panthi B, Mohamed R, Adrada B, Boge M, Candelaria R, Chen H Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1264259.

PMID: 37941561 PMC: 10628525. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1264259.


References
1.
Chen W, Giger M, Li H, Bick U, Newstead G . Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58(3):562-71. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21347. View

2.
Padhani A, Miles K . Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. Radiology. 2010; 256(2):348-64. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091760. View

3.
Wang J, Zhou X, Bradley P, Chang S, Perrimon N, Wong S . Cellular phenotype recognition for high-content RNA interference genome-wide screening. J Biomol Screen. 2008; 13(1):29-39. DOI: 10.1177/1087057107311223. View

4.
Szabo B, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Bone B, Aspelin P . Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(7):1217-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2280-x. View

5.
Leach M, Morgan B, Tofts P, Buckley D, Huang W, Horsfield M . Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(7):1451-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2446-x. View