» Articles » PMID: 28690513

Feature Selection Methods for Zero-Shot Learning of Neural Activity

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jul 11
PMID 28690513
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dimensionality poses a serious challenge when making predictions from human neuroimaging data. Across imaging modalities, large pools of potential neural features (e.g., responses from particular voxels, electrodes, and temporal windows) have to be related to typically limited sets of stimuli and samples. In recent years, zero-shot prediction models have been introduced for mapping between neural signals and semantic attributes, which allows for classification of stimulus classes not explicitly included in the training set. While choices about feature selection can have a substantial impact when closed-set accuracy, open-set robustness, and runtime are competing design objectives, no systematic study of feature selection for these models has been reported. Instead, a relatively straightforward feature stability approach has been adopted and successfully applied across models and imaging modalities. To characterize the tradeoffs in feature selection for zero-shot learning, we compared correlation-based stability to several other feature selection techniques on comparable data sets from two distinct imaging modalities: functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electrocorticography. While most of the feature selection methods resulted in similar zero-shot prediction accuracies and spatial/spectral patterns of selected features, there was one exception; A novel feature/attribute correlation approach was able to achieve those accuracies with far fewer features, suggesting the potential for simpler prediction models that yield high zero-shot classification accuracy.

Citing Articles

Identifying suicide documentation in clinical notes through zero-shot learning.

Workman T, Goulet J, Brandt C, Warren A, Eleazer J, Skanderson M Health Sci Rep. 2023; 6(9):e1526.

PMID: 37706016 PMC: 10495736. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1526.


Graph-Based Deep Learning for Medical Diagnosis and Analysis: Past, Present and Future.

Ahmedt-Aristizabal D, Armin M, Denman S, Fookes C, Petersson L Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(14).

PMID: 34300498 PMC: 8309939. DOI: 10.3390/s21144758.


A zero-shot learning approach to the development of brain-computer interfaces for image retrieval.

McCartney B, Martinez-Del-Rincon J, Devereux B, Murphy B PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0214342.

PMID: 31525201 PMC: 6746355. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214342.


Prediction of Hemodialysis Timing Based on LVW Feature Selection and Ensemble Learning.

Xiong C, Su M, Jiang Z, Jiang W J Med Syst. 2018; 43(1):18.

PMID: 30547238 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-1136-x.

References
1.
Starrfelt R, Gerlach C . The visual what for area: words and pictures in the left fusiform gyrus. Neuroimage. 2007; 35(1):334-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.003. View

2.
Pereira F, Botvinick M, Detre G . Using Wikipedia to learn semantic feature representations of concrete concepts in neuroimaging experiments. Artif Intell. 2012; 194:240-252. PMC: 3519435. DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.005. View

3.
Just M, Cherkassky V, Aryal S, Mitchell T . A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1):e8622. PMC: 2797630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008622. View

4.
Rupp K, Roos M, Milsap G, Caceres C, Ratto C, Chevillet M . Semantic attributes are encoded in human electrocorticographic signals during visual object recognition. Neuroimage. 2017; 148:318-329. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.074. View

5.
Huth A, Nishimoto S, Vu A, Gallant J . A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain. Neuron. 2012; 76(6):1210-24. PMC: 3556488. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.014. View