Life Expectancy and Outcome of Different Treatment Strategies for Critical Limb Ischemia in the Elderly Patients
Overview
General Surgery
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the elderly patients is challenging because of the comorbidity and fragility of these patients. We analyzed survival in relation to different treatment options and estimated life expectancy of our study group by age and gender.
Methods: All patients aged ≥70 years, presenting with chronic CLI, between 2006 and 2013 were included. The treatment was conservative, endovascular, surgical, or by primary major amputation. The interest was in the effect of conservative versus nonconservative treatment on survival. Furthermore, we compared mortality and life expectancy between the study population to the overall Dutch population by age and gender.
Results: In total, 686 legs in 651 patients were treated. Initial treatment of patients was conservative (n = 181), endovascular (n = 259), surgical (n = 169), or amputation (n = 42). The overall 1-year mortality was 29%. Patients were stratified by age: 70-79 (n = 350) years and ≥80 (n = 301) years. Higher mortality rate ratios (RR) were found in octogenarians compared with patients aged 70-79 years, in the endovascular (P < 0.001) and surgical (P < 0.001) group. The mortality RRs of conservative relatively to nonconservative treatment was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-1.09; P = 0.19), not significantly differing between both age groups (P = 0.74). The mortality RR of 3.72 of our study population to the Dutch general population was high, with an excess mortality of 272%. Life expectancy at the age of 70 years was substantially decreased by 9 and 8 years for, respectively, the male and female population.
Conclusions: Mortality rates in elderly patients with CLI are high, corresponding with a decreased life expectancy, regardless of the type of intervention. Revascularization is associated with high periprocedural mortality, especially in octogenarians. Conservative treatment is noninferior to nonconservative treatment in terms of mortality and should be considered as the treatment in octogenarians with substantial comorbidity.
Critical Limb Ischaemia in Octogenarians: Treatment Outcomes Compared With Younger Patients.
Ormaechevarria A, Vega de Ceniga M, Blanco J, Yanez L, Fernandez J, Estallo L EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024; 61:36-42.
PMID: 38312331 PMC: 10837062. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.12.003.
Meulenbroek A, Faes M, van Mil S, Buimer M, de Groot H, Veen E Clin Interv Aging. 2022; 17:767-776.
PMID: 35586779 PMC: 9109801. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S357812.
Critical Limb Ischemia in Nonagenarians: A Challenge of Our Times.
Casajuana Urgell E, Calsina Juscafresa L, Nieto Fernandez L, Romero Montana L, Llort Pont C, Clara Velasco A World J Surg. 2022; 46(11):2825-2831.
PMID: 35507077 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06570-5.
Butala N, Raja A, Xu J, Strom J, Schermerhorn M, Beckman J J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10(24):e023138.
PMID: 34913364 PMC: 9075246. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023138.
Su M, Liu C J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021; 18(11):957-967.
PMID: 34908930 PMC: 8648539. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.11.007.