» Articles » PMID: 28689314

Overview of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging

Overview
Date 2017 Jul 10
PMID 28689314
Citations 243
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of machine learning (ML) has been increasing rapidly in the medical imaging field, including computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), radiomics, and medical image analysis. Recently, an ML area called deep learning emerged in the computer vision field and became very popular in many fields. It started from an event in late 2012, when a deep-learning approach based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) won an overwhelming victory in the best-known worldwide computer vision competition, ImageNet Classification. Since then, researchers in virtually all fields, including medical imaging, have started actively participating in the explosively growing field of deep learning. In this paper, the area of deep learning in medical imaging is overviewed, including (1) what was changed in machine learning before and after the introduction of deep learning, (2) what is the source of the power of deep learning, (3) two major deep-learning models: a massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) and a convolutional neural network (CNN), (4) similarities and differences between the two models, and (5) their applications to medical imaging. This review shows that ML with feature input (or feature-based ML) was dominant before the introduction of deep learning, and that the major and essential difference between ML before and after deep learning is the learning of image data directly without object segmentation or feature extraction; thus, it is the source of the power of deep learning, although the depth of the model is an important attribute. The class of ML with image input (or image-based ML) including deep learning has a long history, but recently gained popularity due to the use of the new terminology, deep learning. There are two major models in this class of ML in medical imaging, MTANN and CNN, which have similarities as well as several differences. In our experience, MTANNs were substantially more efficient in their development, had a higher performance, and required a lesser number of training cases than did CNNs. "Deep learning", or ML with image input, in medical imaging is an explosively growing, promising field. It is expected that ML with image input will be the mainstream area in the field of medical imaging in the next few decades.

Citing Articles

Deep learning-based malaria parasite detection: convolutional neural networks model for accurate species identification of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax.

Ramos-Briceno D, Flammia-DAleo A, Fernandez-Lopez G, Carrion-Nessi F, Forero-Pena D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3746.

PMID: 39885248 PMC: 11782605. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87979-5.


Systematic Review of Hybrid Vision Transformer Architectures for Radiological Image Analysis.

Kim J, Khan A, Banerjee I J Imaging Inform Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39871042 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01322-4.


The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection.

Berghout T J Imaging. 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 39852315 PMC: 11766058. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging11010002.


Reconstruction of Optical Coherence Tomography Images from Wavelength Space Using Deep Learning.

Viqar M, Sahin E, Stoykova E, Madjarova V Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.

PMID: 39796883 PMC: 11723098. DOI: 10.3390/s25010093.


a data augmentation strategy to narrow the robustness gap between expert radiologists and deep learning classifiers.

Lerch L, Huber L, Kamath A, Pollinger A, Pahud de Mortanges A, Obmann V Front Radiol. 2025; 4:1420545.

PMID: 39758512 PMC: 11696537. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1420545.


References
1.
Wang S, Yao J, Summers R . Improved classifier for computer-aided polyp detection in CT colonography by nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Med Phys. 2008; 35(4):1377-86. PMC: 2669284. DOI: 10.1118/1.2870218. View

2.
Miki Y, Muramatsu C, Hayashi T, Zhou X, Hara T, Katsumata A . Classification of teeth in cone-beam CT using deep convolutional neural network. Comput Biol Med. 2016; 80:24-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.11.003. View

3.
Shiraishi J, Li Q, Suzuki K, Engelmann R, Doi K . Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for the detection of lung nodules on chest radiographs: localized search method based on anatomical classification. Med Phys. 2006; 33(7):2642-53. DOI: 10.1118/1.2208739. View

4.
Aoyama M, Li Q, Katsuragawa S, MacMahon H, Doi K . Automated computerized scheme for distinction between benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on chest images. Med Phys. 2002; 29(5):701-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.1469630. View

5.
Suzuki K . Pixel-based machine learning in medical imaging. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012; 2012:792079. PMC: 3299341. DOI: 10.1155/2012/792079. View