» Articles » PMID: 28687431

Resectable Invasive IPMN Versus Sporadic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas: Should These Two Different Diseases Receive the Same Treatment? A Matched Comparison Study of the French Surgical Association (AFC)

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2017 Jul 9
PMID 28687431
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare survival and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IIPMN) and sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods: From 2005 to 2012, 240 patients underwent pancreatectomy for IIPMN and 1327 for PDAC. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic resection other than PD, vascular resection, carcinoma in situ, or <11 examined lymph nodes. Thus, 82 IIPMN and 506 PDAC were eligible for the present study. Finally, The IIPMN group was matched 1:2 to compose the PDAC group according to TNM disease stage, perineural invasion, lymph node ratio, and margin status.

Results: There was no difference in patient's characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and histologic parameters. Overall survival and disease-free survival times were comparable between the 2 groups. In each group, overall survival time was significantly poorer in patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.03 for the IIPMN group; p = 0.03 for the PDAC group). In lymph-node negative patients of the IIPMN group, adjuvant chemotherapy did not have any significant impact on overall survival time (OR = 0.57; 95% CI [0.24-1.33]). Considering the whole population (i.e. patients with IIPMN and PDAC; n = 246), patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy had poorer survival (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The courses of IIPMN and PDAC were similar after an optimized stage-to-stage comparison. Adjuvant chemotherapy was efficient in both groups. However, in lymph node negative patients, adjuvant chemotherapy seemed not to have a significant impact.

Citing Articles

Is chemotherapy beneficial? A retrospective study of chemotherapy in patients with invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous carcinoma.

Ouyang Y, Liu P, Chu L, Xiao Y, Zhu H, Hao Q Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38430.

PMID: 39430496 PMC: 11489152. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38430.


Is multidisciplinary treatment effective for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma?.

Hirono S, Higuchi R, Honda G, Nara S, Esaki M, Gotohda N Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024; 8(5):845-859.

PMID: 39229554 PMC: 11368504. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12790.


A narrative review on rare types of pancreatic cancer: should they be treated as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas?.

de Jesus V, Donadio M, de Brito A, Gentilli A Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024; 16:17588359241265213.

PMID: 39072242 PMC: 11282540. DOI: 10.1177/17588359241265213.


Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Cytologic-histologic correlation study and evaluation of the cytologic accuracy in identifying high-grade dysplasia/invasive adenocarcinoma.

Serinelli S, Khurana K Cytojournal. 2024; 21:6.

PMID: 38343764 PMC: 10858787. DOI: 10.25259/Cytojournal_71_2023.


Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Compared with de Novo Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Fogliati A, Zironda A, Fiorentini G, Adjei S, Amro A, Starlinger P Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(4):2632-2639.

PMID: 38319513 PMC: 10908613. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14875-5.