» Articles » PMID: 28687073

Association of Neuron-specific Enolase Values with Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest Survivors is Dependent on the Time of Sample Collection

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2017 Jul 9
PMID 28687073
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite marked advances in intensive cardiology care, current options for outcome prediction in cardiac arrest survivors remain significantly limited. The aim of our study was, therefore, to compare the day-specific association of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) with outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors treated with hypothermia.

Methods: Eligible patients were OHCA survivors treated with targeted temperature management at 33 °C for 24 h using an endovascular device. Blood samples for NSE levels measurement were drawn on days 1, 2, 3, and 4 after hospital admission. Thirty-day neurological outcomes according to the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale and 12-month mortality were evaluated as clinical end points.

Results: A total of 153 cardiac arrest survivors (mean age 64.2 years) were enrolled in the present study. Using ROC analysis, optimal cutoff values of NSE for prediction of CPC 3-5 score on specific days were determined as: day 1 > 20.4 mcg/L (sensitivity 63.3%; specificity 82.1%; P = 0.002); day 2 > 29.0 mcg/L (72.5%; 94.4%; P < 0.001); and day 3 > 20.7 mcg/L (94.4%; 86.7%; P < 0.001). The highest predictive value, however, was observed on day 4 > 19.4 mcg/L (93.5%; 91.0%; P < 0.001); NSE value >50.2 mcg/L at day 4 was associated with poor outcome with 100% specificity and 42% sensitivity. Moreover, NSE levels measured on all individual days also predicted 12-month mortality (P < 0.001); the highest predictive value for death was observed on day 3 > 18.1 mcg/L (85.3%; 72.0%; P < 0.001). Significant association with prognosis was found also for changes in NSE at different time points. An NSE level on day 4 > 20.0 mcg/L, together with a change > 0.0 mcg/L from day 3 to day 4, predicted poor outcome (CPC 3-5) with 100% specificity and 73% sensitivity.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that NSE levels are a useful tool for predicting 30-day neurological outcome and long-term mortality in OHCA survivors treated with targeted temperature management at 33 °C. The highest associations of NSE with outcomes were observed on day 4 and day 3 after cardiac arrest.

Citing Articles

Effects of intrathecal administration of sodium nitroprusside and nicardipine on cerebral pial microcirculation, cortical tissue oxygenation, and electrocortical activity in the early post-resuscitation period in a porcine cardiac arrest model.

Lee H, Mamadjonov N, Jeung K, Jung Y, Heo W, Cho Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313257.

PMID: 39879197 PMC: 11778705. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313257.


Validation of neuron-specific enolase in cardiac arrest patients with limited withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.

Lee D, Lee B, Cho Y, Kim D, Ryu S, Min J Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34618.

PMID: 39113971 PMC: 11305282. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34618.


Multifunctional roles of γ-enolase in the central nervous system: more than a neuronal marker.

Horvat S, Kos J, Pislar A Cell Biosci. 2024; 14(1):61.

PMID: 38735971 PMC: 11089681. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-024-01240-6.


Neuron-Specific Enolase-What Are We Measuring?.

Babkina A, Lyubomudrov M, Golubev M, Pisarev M, Golubev A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38732258 PMC: 11084499. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25095040.


Predictive Performance of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) for Survival after Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kurek K, Swieczkowski D, Pruc M, Tomaszewska M, Cubala W, Szarpak L J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137724 PMC: 10744223. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247655.


References
1.
Tiainen M, Roine R, Pettila V, Takkunen O . Serum neuron-specific enolase and S-100B protein in cardiac arrest patients treated with hypothermia. Stroke. 2003; 34(12):2881-6. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000103320.90706.35. View

2.
Wijdicks E, Hijdra A, Young G, Bassetti C, Wiebe S . Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2006; 67(2):203-10. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000227183.21314.cd. View

3.
Callaway C, Donnino M, Fink E, Geocadin R, Golan E, Kern K . Part 8: Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S465-82. PMC: 4959439. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000262. View

4.
Grasner J, Lefering R, Koster R, Masterson S, Bottiger B, Herlitz J . EuReCa ONE-27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry: A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe. Resuscitation. 2016; 105:188-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.004. View

5.
Nolan J, Soar J, Cariou A, Cronberg T, Moulaert V, Deakin C . European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines for Post-resuscitation Care 2015: Section 5 of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Resuscitation. 2015; 95:202-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.018. View