» Articles » PMID: 28684801

Characterization of Short- and Long-term Mechanical Sensitisation Following Surgical Tail Amputation in Pigs

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Jul 8
PMID 28684801
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Commercial pigs are frequently exposed to tail mutilations in the form of preventive husbandry procedures (tail docking) or as a result of abnormal behaviour (tail biting). Although tissue and nerve injuries are well-described causes of pain hypersensitivity in humans and in rodent animal models, there is no information on the changes in local pain sensitivity induced by tail injuries in pigs. To determine the temporal profile of sensitisation, pigs were exposed to surgical tail resections and mechanical nociceptive thresholds (MNT) were measured in the acute (one week post-operatively) and in the long-term (either eight or sixteen weeks post-surgery) phase of recovery. The influence of the degree of amputation on MNTs was also evaluated by comparing three different tail-resection treatments (intact, 'short tail', 'long tail'). A significant reduction in MNTs one week following surgery suggests the occurrence of acute sensitisation. Long-term hypersensitivity was also observed in tail-resected pigs at either two or four months following surgery. Tail amputation in pigs appears to evoke acute and sustained changes in peripheral mechanical sensitivity, which resemble features of neuropathic pain reported in humans and other species and provides new information on implications for the welfare of animals subjected to this type of injury.

Citing Articles

Part I: understanding pain in pigs-basic knowledge about pain assessment, measures and therapy.

Kschonek J, Twele L, Deters K, Miller M, Reinmold J, Emmerich I Porcine Health Manag. 2025; 11(1):12.

PMID: 40069905 PMC: 11895375. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-025-00421-0.


Pain Relief Interventions in Australian Livestock Husbandry: A Review of Animal Welfare and Pain Duration.

Metcalf L, Lomax S, Van der Saag D, Garg S, White P Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(13).

PMID: 38998013 PMC: 11240665. DOI: 10.3390/ani14131901.


On determining the mechanical nociceptive threshold in pigs: a reliability study.

Andreis F, Morch C, Jensen W, Meijs S Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023; 4:1191786.

PMID: 37265942 PMC: 10229834. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1191786.


Welfare of pigs on farm.

Nielsen S, Alvarez J, Bicout D, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe J EFSA J. 2022; 20(8):e07421.

PMID: 36034323 PMC: 9405538. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7421.


The Neuroimmune Interface and Chronic Pain Through the Lens of Production Animals.

Johnston C, Whittaker A, Franklin S, Hutchinson M Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:887042.

PMID: 35663552 PMC: 9160236. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.887042.


References
1.
Hunter J, Katz J, Davis K . Stability of phantom limb phenomena after upper limb amputation: a longitudinal study. Neuroscience. 2008; 156(4):939-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.07.053. View

2.
Flor H, Nikolajsen L, Jensen T . Phantom limb pain: a case of maladaptive CNS plasticity?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7(11):873-81. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1991. View

3.
Flor H . Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2003; 1(3):182-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00074-1. View

4.
Fisher G, BOSWICK Jr J . Neuroma formation following digital amputations. J Trauma. 1983; 23(2):136-42. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198302000-00012. View

5.
Nikolajsen L, Jensen T . Phantom limb pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 87(1):107-16. DOI: 10.1093/bja/87.1.107. View