» Articles » PMID: 28678992

Assessment of a Person-Level Risk Calculator to Predict New-Onset Bipolar Spectrum Disorder in Youth at Familial Risk

Abstract

Importance: Early identification of individuals at high risk for the onset of bipolar spectrum disorder (BPSD) is key from both a clinical and research perspective. While previous work has identified the presence of a bipolar prodrome, the predictive implications for the individual have not been assessed, to date.

Objective: To build a risk calculator to predict the 5-year onset of BPSD in youth at familial risk for BPSD.

Design, Setting, And Participants: The Pittsburgh Bipolar Offspring Study is an ongoing community-based longitudinal cohort investigation of offspring of parents with bipolar I or II (and community controls), recruited between November 2001 and July 2007, with a median follow-up period of more than 9 years. Recruitment has ended, but follow-up is ongoing. The present analysis included offspring of parents with bipolar I or II (aged 6-17 years) who had not yet developed BPSD at baseline.

Main Outcomes And Measures: This study tested the degree to which a time-to-event model, including measures of mood and anxiety, general psychosocial functioning, age at mood disorder onset in the bipolar parent, and age at each visit, predicted new-onset BPSD. To fully use longitudinal data, the study assessed each visit separately, clustering within individuals. Discrimination was measured using the time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), predicting 5-year risk; internal validation was performed using 1000 bootstrapped resamples. Calibration was assessed by comparing observed vs predicted probability of new-onset BPSD.

Results: There were 412 at-risk offspring (202 [49.0%] female), with a mean (SD) visit age of 12.0 (3.5) years and a mean (SD) age at new-onset BPSD of 14.2 (4.5) years. Among them, 54 (13.1%) developed BPSD during follow-up (18 with BD I or II); these participants contributed a total of 1058 visits, 67 (6.3%) of which preceded new-onset BPSD within the next 5 years. Using internal validation to account for overfitting, the model provided good discrimination between converting vs nonconverting visits (AUC, 0.76; bootstrapped 95% CI, 0.71-0.82). Important univariate predictors of outcome (AUC range, 0.66-0.70) were dimensional measures of mania, depression, anxiety, and mood lability; psychosocial functioning; and parental age at mood disorder.

Conclusions And Relevance: This risk calculator provides a practical tool for assessing the probability that a youth at familial risk for BPSD will develop new-onset BPSD within the next 5 years. Such a tool may be used by clinicians to inform frequency of monitoring and treatment options and for research studies to better identify potential participants at ultra high risk of conversion.

Citing Articles

Identifcation of candidate biomarkers for polyarteritis nodosa using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Ma H, Cai X, Zhang D, Zhu Q, Wu T, Aierken X Am J Transl Res. 2025; 17(1):585-602.

PMID: 39959243 PMC: 11826199. DOI: 10.62347/QSRI6160.


Development and predictors of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents with depressive disorders: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Salazar de Pablo G, Perez-Rodriguez V, de Otazu Olivares J, Camacho-Rubio J, Sharma A, Catalan A Eur Psychiatry. 2025; 68(1):e16.

PMID: 39773691 PMC: 11822963. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1814.


A prognostic model for predicting functional impairment in youth mental health services.

Iorfino F, Oliveira R, Cripps S, Marchant R, Varidel M, Capon W Eur Psychiatry. 2024; 67(1):e87.

PMID: 39697104 PMC: 11733617. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1787.


Pediatric Bipolar Disorder: Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Wozniak J, OConnor H, Iorini M, Ambrose A Paediatr Drugs. 2024; 27(2):125-142.

PMID: 39592559 PMC: 11829910. DOI: 10.1007/s40272-024-00669-z.


Prodromal symptoms of a first manic episode: a qualitative study to the perspectives of patients with bipolar disorder and their caregivers'.

Maassen E, Maathuis L, Regeer B, Kupka R, Regeer E Int J Bipolar Disord. 2024; 12(1):38.

PMID: 39542978 PMC: 11564498. DOI: 10.1186/s40345-024-00360-9.


References
1.
Goldstein B, Shamseddeen W, Axelson D, Kalas C, Monk K, Brent D . Clinical, demographic, and familial correlates of bipolar spectrum disorders among offspring of parents with bipolar disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010; 49(4):388-96. PMC: 2913485. View

2.
Baldessarini R, Tondo L, Vazquez G, Undurraga J, Bolzani L, Yildiz A . Age at onset versus family history and clinical outcomes in 1,665 international bipolar-I disorder patients. World Psychiatry. 2012; 11(1):40-6. PMC: 3266753. DOI: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.006. View

3.
Axelson D, Birmaher B, Strober M, Goldstein B, Ha W, Gill M . Course of subthreshold bipolar disorder in youth: diagnostic progression from bipolar disorder not otherwise specified. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011; 50(10):1001-16.e3. PMC: 3185249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.005. View

4.
Cannon T, Yu C, Addington J, Bearden C, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B . An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2016; 173(10):980-988. PMC: 5048498. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070890. View

5.
Tripepi G, Heinze G, Jager K, Stel V, Dekker F, Zoccali C . Risk prediction models. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28(8):1975-80. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft095. View