Comparison of C-arm Computed Tomography and On-site Quick Cortisol Assay for Adrenal Venous Sampling: A Retrospective Study of 178 Patients
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To compare the performance of on-site quick cortisol assay (QCA) and C-arm computed tomography (CT) assistance on adrenal venous sampling (AVS) without adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation.
Methods: The institutional review board at our hospital approved this retrospective study, which included 178 consecutive patients with primary aldosteronism. During AVS, we used C-arm CT to confirm right adrenal cannulation between May 2012 and June 2015 (n = 100) and QCA for bilateral adrenal cannulation between July 2015 and September 2016 (n = 78). Successful AVS required a selectivity index (cortisol/cortisol) of ≥ 2.0 bilaterally.
Results: The overall success rate of C-arm CT-assisted AVS was 87%, which increased to 97.4% under QCA (P = .013). The procedure time (C-arm CT, 49.5 ± 21.3 min; QCA, 37.5 ± 15.6 min; P < .001) and radiation dose (C-arm CT, 673.9 ± 613.8 mGy; QCA, 346.4 ± 387.8 mGy; P < .001) were also improved. The resampling rate was 16% and 21.8% for C-arm CT and QCA, respectively. The initial success rate of the performing radiologist remained stable during the study period (C-arm CT 75%; QCA, 82.1%, P = .259).
Conclusions: QCA might be superior to C-arm CT for improving the performance of AVS.
Key Points: • Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is a technically challenging procedure. • C-arm CT and quick cortisol assay (QCA) are efficient for assisting AVS. • QCA might outperform C-arm CT in enhancing AVS performance.
Yang J, Bell D, Carroll R, Chiang C, Cowley D, Croker E Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2024; 102(1):31-43.
PMID: 39360599 PMC: 11612544. DOI: 10.1111/cen.15139.
Selective venous sampling for secondary hypertension.
Liu C, Zheng F, Zhang X, Pan J, Ding W, Tian X Hypertens Res. 2024; 47(7):1766-1778.
PMID: 38750220 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01699-3.
Aiga K, Kometani M, Karashima S, Konishi S, Higashitani T, Aono D Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22429.
PMID: 38104216 PMC: 10725449. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49808-5.
Peng Y, Tang G, Sun M, Yu S, Cheng Y, Wang Y Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(1):50-59.
PMID: 37566275 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10077-5.
Well L, Spink C, Lenz A, Avanesov M, Salamon J, Adam G PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0279552.
PMID: 36584085 PMC: 9803090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279552.