» Articles » PMID: 28676892

Methodology, Outcome, Safety and in Vivo Accuracy in Traditional Frame-based Stereoelectroencephalography

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2017 Jul 6
PMID 28676892
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an established diagnostic technique for the localization of the epileptogenic zone in drug-resistant epilepsy. In vivo accuracy of SEEG electrode positioning is of paramount importance since higher accuracy may lead to more precise resective surgery, better seizure outcome and reduction of complications.

Objective: To describe experiences with the SEEG technique in our comprehensive epilepsy center, to illustrate surgical methodology, to evaluate in vivo application accuracy and to consider the diagnostic yield of SEEG implantations.

Methods: All patients who underwent SEEG implantations between September 2008 and April 2016 were analyzed. Planned electrode trajectories were compared with post-implantation trajectories after fusion of pre- and postoperative imaging. Quantitative analysis of deviation using Euclidean distance and directional errors was performed. Explanatory variables for electrode accuracy were analyzed using linear regression modeling. The surgical methodology, procedure-related complications and diagnostic yield were reported.

Results: Seventy-six implantations were performed in 71 patients, and a total of 902 electrodes were implanted. Median entry and target point deviations were 1.54 mm and 2.93 mm. Several factors that predicted entry and target point accuracy were identified. The rate of major complications was 2.6%. SEEG led to surgical therapy of various modalities in 53 patients (69.7%).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that entry and target point localization errors can be predicted by linear regression models, which can aid in identification of high-risk electrode trajectories and further enhancement of accuracy. SEEG is a reliable technique, as demonstrated by the high accuracy of conventional frame-based implantation methodology and the good diagnostic yield.

Citing Articles

Frameless Stereotaxy in Stereoelectroencephalography Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography.

Grote A, Gjorgjevski M, Carl B, Delev D, Knake S, Menzler K Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002517 PMC: 11853342. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020184.


Clinical Applicability and Safety of Conventional Frame-Based Stereotactic Techniques for Stereoelectroencephalography.

Kim J, Hong S, Kim H, Yum M, Ko T, Koo Y J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024; 67(6):661-674.

PMID: 38986517 PMC: 11540521. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0246.


Frame-based versus robot-assisted stereo-electro-encephalography for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Han C, Chou C, Chen H, Chen Y, Lin C, Chen C Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024; 166(1):85.

PMID: 38361129 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05983-6.


Frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency: methodology, results, complications and stereotactic application accuracy in pediatric hypothalamic hamartomas.

Li P, Zhou Y, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Wang M, Zhu R Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1259171.

PMID: 37928157 PMC: 10621047. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1259171.


Robot-assisted stereoencephalography vs subdural electrodes in the evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy.

Gorbachuk M, Machetanz K, Weinbrenner E, Grimm F, Wuttke T, Wang S Epilepsia Open. 2023; 8(3):888-897.

PMID: 37149851 PMC: 10472365. DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12756.


References
1.
Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Thompson S, Gale J, Smithason S, Najm I . Technique, Results, and Complications Related to Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography. Neurosurgery. 2015; 78(2):169-80. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001034. View

2.
Polkey C . Epilepsy surgery: non-invasive versus invasive focus localization. What is needed from the neurosurgical point of view. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1994; 152:183-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb05218.x. View

3.
Woerdeman P, Willems P, Noordmans H, Tulleken C, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel J . Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods. J Neurosurg. 2007; 106(6):1012-6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1012. View

4.
Adelson P, Black P, Madsen J, Kramer U, Rockoff M, Riviello J . Use of subdural grids and strip electrodes to identify a seizure focus in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995; 22(4):174-80. DOI: 10.1159/000120898. View

5.
Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Alexopoulos A, Jehi L, Bingaman W, Najm I . Stereoelectroencephalography in the "difficult to localize" refractory focal epilepsy: early experience from a North American epilepsy center. Epilepsia. 2012; 54(2):323-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03672.x. View