» Articles » PMID: 28673522

Very Early Disengagement and Subsequent Re-engagement in Primary Care Office Based Opioid Treatment (OBOT) with Buprenorphine

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Jul 5
PMID 28673522
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Patients with opioid use disorder often require multiple treatment attempts before achieving stable recovery. Rates of disengagement from buprenorphine are highest in the first month of treatment and termination of buprenorphine therapy results in return to use rates as high as 90%. To better characterize these at-risk patients, this study aims to describe: 1) the frequency and characteristics of patients with very early disengagement (≤1month) from Office Based Opioid Treatment (OBOT) with buprenorphine and 2) the frequency and characteristics of patients who re-engage in care at this same OBOT clinic within 2years, among the subset of very early disengagers.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients enrolled in a large urban OBOT program. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample and the proportion of patients with very early (≤1month) disengagement and their re-engagement. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient characteristics associated with the outcomes of very early disengagement and re-engagement. Potential predictors included: sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, employment, opioid use history, prior substance use treatments, urine drug testing, and psychiatric diagnoses.

Results: Overall, very early disengagement was unusual, with only 8.4% (104/1234) of patients disengaging within the first month. Among the subset of very early disengagers with 2years of follow-up, the proportion who re-engaged with this OBOT program in the subsequent 2years was 11.9% (10/84). Urine drug test positive for opiates within the first month (AOR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.02-3.93) was associated with increased odds of very early disengagement. Transferring from another buprenorphine prescriber (AOR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.70) was associated with decreased odds of very early disengagement. No characteristics were significantly associated with re-engagement.

Conclusions: Early disengagement is uncommon; however, continued opioid use appeared to be associated with higher odds of treatment disengagement and these patients may warrant additional support. Re-engagement was uncommon, suggesting the need for a more formal explicit system to encourage and facilitate re-engagement among patients who disengage.

Citing Articles

Organization of primary care and early MOUD discontinuation.

Harris R, Kearney M, Keddem S, Calderbank T, Tomczuk L, Clapp J Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024; 19(1):96.

PMID: 39702538 PMC: 11658460. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00527-w.


Impact of Alternative Ways to Operationalize Buprenorphine Treatment Duration on Understanding Continuity of Care for Opioid Use Disorder.

Dong H, Stringfellow E, Russell W, Bearnot B, Jalali M Int J Ment Health Addict. 2024; 22(4):2285-2290.

PMID: 39629044 PMC: 11614103. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-022-00985-w.


Are gaps in rates of retention on buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder closing among veterans across different races and ethnicities? A retrospective cohort study.

Hayes C, Raciborski R, Martin B, Gordon A, Hudson T, Brown C J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024; 166:209461.

PMID: 39067770 PMC: 11392633. DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209461.


Low-dose buprenorphine initiation and treatment continuation among hospitalized patients with opioid dependence: A retrospective cohort study.

Hayes B, Li P, Nienaltow T, Torres-Lockhart K, Khalid L, Fox A J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023; 158:209261.

PMID: 38103838 PMC: 10947892. DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209261.


Buprenorphine use and courses of care for opioid use disorder treatment within the Veterans Health Administration.

Gordon A, Saxon A, Kertesz S, Wyse J, Manhapra A, Lin L Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023; 248:109902.

PMID: 37196572 PMC: 10875624. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109902.


References
1.
Davoli M, Bargagli A, Perucci C, Schifano P, Belleudi V, Hickman M . Risk of fatal overdose during and after specialist drug treatment: the VEdeTTE study, a national multi-site prospective cohort study. Addiction. 2007; 102(12):1954-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02025.x. View

2.
White J, Irvine R . Mechanisms of fatal opioid overdose. Addiction. 2000; 94(7):961-72. View

3.
Whitley S, Sohler N, Kunins H, Giovanniello A, Li X, Sacajiu G . Factors associated with complicated buprenorphine inductions. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 39(1):51-7. PMC: 4755478. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.04.001. View

4.
Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo M, Indave B, Degenhardt L, Wiessing L . Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2017; 357:j1550. PMC: 5421454. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j1550. View

5.
Marcovitz D, McHugh R, Volpe J, Votaw V, Connery H . Predictors of early dropout in outpatient buprenorphine/naloxone treatment. Am J Addict. 2016; 25(6):472-7. PMC: 5014362. DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12414. View