Cost-effectiveness Analysis of N95 Respirators and Medical Masks to Protect Healthcare Workers in China from Respiratory Infections
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: There are substantial differences between the costs of medical masks and N95 respirators. Cost-effectiveness analysis is required to assist decision-makers evaluating alternative healthcare worker (HCW) mask/respirator strategies. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of N95 respirators and medical masks for protecting HCWs in Beijing, China.
Methods: We developed a cost-effectiveness analysis model utilising efficacy and resource use data from two cluster randomised clinical trials assessing various mask/respirator strategies conducted in HCWs in Level 2 and 3 Beijing hospitals for the 2008-09 and 2009-10 influenza seasons. The main outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per clinical respiratory illness (CRI) case prevented. We used a societal perspective which included intervention costs, the healthcare costs of CRI in HCWs and absenteeism costs.
Results: The incremental cost to prevent a CRI case with continuous use of N95 respirators when compared to medical masks ranged from US $490-$1230 (approx. 3000-7600 RMB). One-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the CRI attack rate and intervention effectiveness had the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions: The determination of cost-effectiveness for mask/respirator strategies will depend on the willingness to pay to prevent a CRI case in a HCW, which will vary between countries. In the case of a highly pathogenic pandemic, respirator use in HCWs would likely be a cost-effective intervention.
Sharma M, Sra H, Painter C, Pan-Ngum W, Luangasanatip N, Chauhan A PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0299309.
PMID: 38768249 PMC: 11104672. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299309.
Determinants of latent tuberculosis infection among nurses at public health centers in Indonesia.
Erawati M, Andriany M Belitung Nurs J. 2023; 8(1):28-34.
PMID: 37521074 PMC: 10386802. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.1846.
Thiel C, Sreedhar P, Silva G, Greene H, Seetharaman M, Durr M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(3).
PMID: 36767940 PMC: 9915410. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032575.
Young C, Byrne J, Wentworth A, Collins J, Chu J, Traverso G Glob Chall. 2022; :2200001.
PMID: 35601599 PMC: 9110919. DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202200001.
Wang Q, Shi N, Huang J, Yang L, Cui T, Ai J Front Public Health. 2022; 9:726690.
PMID: 35059369 PMC: 8763804. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.726690.