» Articles » PMID: 28673117

Using a Social Robot to Teach Gestural Recognition and Production in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2017 Jul 5
PMID 28673117
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While it has been argued that children with autism spectrum disorders are responsive to robot-like toys, very little research has examined the impact of robot-based intervention on gesture use. These children have delayed gestural development. We used a social robot in two phases to teach them to recognize and produce eight pantomime gestures that expressed feelings and needs. Compared to the children in the wait-list control group (N = 6), those in the intervention group (N = 7) were more likely to recognize gestures and to gesture accurately in trained and untrained scenarios. They also generalized the acquired recognition (but not production) skills to human-to-human interaction. The benefits and limitations of robot-based intervention for gestural learning were highlighted. Implications for Rehabilitation Compared to typically-developing children, children with autism spectrum disorders have delayed development of gesture comprehension and production. Robot-based intervention program was developed to teach children with autism spectrum disorders recognition (Phase I) and production (Phase II) of eight pantomime gestures that expressed feelings and needs. Children in the intervention group (but not in the wait-list control group) were able to recognize more gestures in both trained and untrained scenarios and generalize the acquired gestural recognition skills to human-to-human interaction. Similar findings were reported for gestural production except that there was no strong evidence showing children in the intervention group could produce gestures accurately in human-to-human interaction.

Citing Articles

People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Could Interact More Easily with a Robot than with a Human: Reasons and Limits.

Dubois-Sage M, Jacquet B, Jamet F, Baratgin J Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392485 PMC: 10886012. DOI: 10.3390/bs14020131.


Information and communication technologies-based interventions for children with autism spectrum conditions: a systematic review of randomized control trials from a positive technology perspective.

Scarcella I, Marino F, Failla C, Doria G, Chila P, Minutoli R Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1212522.

PMID: 37547218 PMC: 10398379. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1212522.


Motor differences in autism during a human-robot imitative gesturing task.

Fears N, Sherrod G, Blankenship D, Patterson R, Hynan L, Wijayasinghe I Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023; 106:105987.

PMID: 37207496 PMC: 10684312. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105987.


Do different robot appearances change emotion recognition in children with ASD?.

Pinto-Bernal M, Sierra M S, Munera M, Casas D, Villa-Moreno A, Frizera-Neto A Front Neurorobot. 2023; 17:1044491.

PMID: 36937553 PMC: 10017775. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1044491.


The use of social robots with children and young people on the autism spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kouroupa A, Laws K, Irvine K, Mengoni S, Baird A, Sharma S PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0269800.

PMID: 35731805 PMC: 9216612. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269800.