» Articles » PMID: 28663727

Who Deserves My Trust? Cue-Elicited Feedback Negativity Tracks Reputation Learning in Repeated Social Interactions

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jul 1
PMID 28663727
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Trust and trustworthiness contribute to reciprocal behavior and social relationship development. To make better decisions, people need to evaluate others' trustworthiness. They often assess this kind of reputation by learning through repeated social interactions. The present event-related potential (ERP) study explored the reputation learning process in a repeated trust game where subjects made multi-round decisions of investment to different partners. We found that subjects gradually learned to discriminate trustworthy partners from untrustworthy ones based on how often their partners reciprocated the investment, which was indicated by their own investment decisions. Besides, electrophysiological data showed that the faces of the untrustworthy partners induced larger feedback negativity (FN) amplitude than those of the trustworthy partners, but only in the late phase of the game. The ERP results corresponded with the behavioral pattern and revealed that the learned trustworthiness differentiation was coded by the cue-elicited FN component. Consistent with previous research, our findings suggest that the anterior cue-elicited FN reflects the reputation appraisal and tracks the reputation learning process in social interactions.

Citing Articles

Beauty Is Not Always a Perk: The Role of Attractiveness and Social Interest in Trust Decisions.

Shang J, Zhang Y Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001806 PMC: 11851420. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020175.


The Effect of Trustor Age and Trustee Age on Trustworthiness Judgments: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Chen Z, Li Y, Wang K, Qi Y, Liu X Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:815482.

PMID: 35370611 PMC: 8965570. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.815482.


How collective reward structure impedes group decision making: An experimental study using the HoneyComb paradigm.

Ritter M, Wang M, Pritz J, Menssen O, Boos M PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259963.

PMID: 34784396 PMC: 8594797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259963.


Context-based interpersonal relationship modulates social comparison between outcomes: an event-related potential study.

Zhang H, Gu R, Yang M, Zhang M, Han F, Li H Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021; 16(4):439-452.

PMID: 33527110 PMC: 7990070. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa167.


Outcome Evaluation Affects Facial Trustworthiness: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Leng H, Liu Y, Li Q, Wu Q, Li D, Jiang Z Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:514142.

PMID: 33240058 PMC: 7683520. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.514142.


References
1.
Engell A, Haxby J, Todorov A . Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in the human amygdala. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(9):1508-19. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1508. View

2.
Mattavelli G, Andrews T, Asghar A, Towler J, Young A . Response of face-selective brain regions to trustworthiness and gender of faces. Neuropsychologia. 2012; 50(9):2205-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.024. View

3.
Tzieropoulos H, Grave de Peralta R, Bossaerts P, Andino S . The impact of disappointment in decision making: inter-individual differences and electrical neuroimaging. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 4:235. PMC: 3020567. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00235. View

4.
von Borries A, Verkes R, Bulten B, Cools R, De Bruijn E . Feedback-related negativity codes outcome valence, but not outcome expectancy, during reversal learning. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013; 13(4):737-46. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0150-1. View

5.
Delgado M, Frank R, Phelps E . Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(11):1611-8. DOI: 10.1038/nn1575. View