» Articles » PMID: 28659844

Transferability of Dual-Task Coordination Skills After Practice with Changing Component Tasks

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Jun 30
PMID 28659844
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that dual-task performance with two simultaneously presented tasks can be substantially improved as a result of practice. Among other mechanisms, theories of dual-task practice-relate this improvement to the acquisition of task coordination skills. These skills are assumed (1) to result from dual-task practice, but not from single-task practice, and (2) to be independent from the specific stimulus and response mappings during the practice situation and, therefore, transferable to new dual task situations. The present study is the first that provides an elaborated test of these assumptions in a context with well-controllable practice and transfer situations. To this end, we compared the effects of dual-task and single-task practice with a visual and an auditory sensory-motor component task on the dual-task performance in a subsequent transfer session. Importantly, stimulus and stimulus-response mapping conditions in the two component tasks changed repeatedly during practice sessions, which prevents that automatized stimulus-response associations may be transferred from practice to transfer. Dual-task performance was found to be improved after practice with the dual tasks in contrast to the single-task practice. These findings are consistent with the assumption that coordination skills had been acquired, which can be transferred to other dual-task situations independently on the specific stimulus and response mapping conditions of the practiced component tasks.

Citing Articles

Multi-tasking costs in triple-task performance despite dual-task preparation.

Stefani M, Sauter M, Mack W Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 39875715 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01674-w.


Comparing laboratory and online settings: equivalence in training and transfer effects for training task-order coordination processes.

Darnstaedt D, Langsdorf L, Schubert T Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1440057.

PMID: 39411553 PMC: 11473325. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440057.


A mechanism underlying improved dual-task performance after practice: Reviewing evidence for the memory hypothesis.

Schubert T, Kubler S, Strobach T Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(5):2005-2021.

PMID: 38530593 PMC: 11543707. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02498-0.


Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking?.

Pelzer L, Naefgen C, Herzig J, Gaschler R, Haider H Psychol Res. 2024; 88(4):1231-1252.

PMID: 38418590 PMC: 11143036. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-01935-y.


Cognitive control and meta-control in dual-task coordination.

Strobach T Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(4):1445-1460.

PMID: 38087064 PMC: 11358182. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02427-7.


References
1.
Maquestiaux F, Lague-Beauvais M, Ruthruff E, Bherer L . Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Mem Cognit. 2008; 36(7):1262-82. DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1262. View

2.
Becker M, Schubert T, Strobach T, Gallinat J, Kuhn S . Simultaneous interpreters vs. professional multilingual controls: Group differences in cognitive control as well as brain structure and function. Neuroimage. 2016; 134:250-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.079. View

3.
Liepelt R, Strobach T, Frensch P, Schubert T . Improved intertask coordination after extensive dual-task practice. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011; 64(7):1251-72. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543284. View

4.
Strobach T, Frensch P, Muller H, Schubert T . Age- and practice-related influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions of dual-task performance. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2011; 19(1-2):222-47. DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2011.630973. View

5.
Meyer D, Kieras D . A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychol Rev. 1997; 104(1):3-65. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3. View