» Articles » PMID: 28659281

Diverse Roads to Relapse: A Discriminative Cue Signaling Cocaine Availability Is More Effective in Renewing Cocaine Seeking in Goal Trackers Than Sign Trackers and Depends on Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Activity

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Jun 30
PMID 28659281
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stimuli associated with taking drugs are notorious instigators of relapse. There is, however, considerable variation in the motivational properties of such stimuli, both as a function of the individual and the nature of the stimulus. The behavior of some individuals (sign trackers, STs) is especially influenced by cues paired with reward delivery, perhaps because they are prone to process information via dopamine-dependent, cue-driven, incentive salience systems. Other individuals (goal trackers, GTs) are better able to incorporate higher-order contextual information, perhaps because of better executive/attentional control over behavior, which requires frontal cortical cholinergic activity. We hypothesized, therefore, that a cue that "sets the occasion" for drug taking (a discriminative stimulus, DS) would reinstate cocaine seeking more readily in GTs than STs and that this would require intact cholinergic neurotransmission. To test this, male STs and GTs were trained to self-administer cocaine using an intermittent access schedule with periods of cocaine availability and unavailability signaled by a DS and a DS, respectively. Thereafter, half of the rats received an immunotoxic lesion that destroyed 40-50% of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and later, after extinction training, were tested for the ability of noncontingent presentations of the DS to reinstate cocaine seeking behavior. The DS was much more effective in reinstating cocaine seeking in GTs than STs and this effect was abolished by cholinergic losses despite the fact that all rats continued to orient to the DS We conclude that vulnerability to relapse involves interactions between individual cognitive-motivational biases and the form of the drug cue encountered. The most predictable outcome of a diagnosis of addiction is a high chance for relapse. When addicts encounter cues previously associated with drug, their attention may be unduly attracted to such cues and these cues can evoke motivational states that instigate and maintain drug-seeking behavior. Although sign-tracking rats were previously demonstrated to exhibit greater relapse vulnerability to Pavlovian drug cues paired with drug delivery, here, we demonstrate that their counterparts, the goal trackers, are more vulnerable if the drug cue acts to signal drug availability and that the forebrain cholinergic system mediates such vulnerability. Given the importance of contextual cues for triggering relapse and the human cognitive-cholinergic capacity for the processing of such cues, goal trackers model essential aspects of relapse vulnerability.

Citing Articles

Triggered temptations: A new procedure to compare reward-seeking behaviour induced by discriminative and conditioned stimuli in rats.

LeCocq M, Najafipashaki S, Casale D, Laplante I, Samaha A Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025; .

PMID: 39994055 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06764-4.


Cortico-striatal action control inherent of opponent cognitive-motivational styles.

Avila C, Sarter M Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39968969 PMC: 11839163. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.100988.


Relapse after intermittent access to cocaine: Discriminative cues more effectively trigger drug seeking than do conditioned cues.

Ndiaye N, Shamleh S, Casale D, Castaneda-Ouellet S, Laplante I, Robinson M Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 241(10):2015-2032.

PMID: 38767684 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06614-9.


Leveraging individual differences in cue-reward learning to investigate the psychological and neural basis of shared psychiatric symptomatology: The sign-tracker/goal-tracker model.

Felix P, Flagel S Behav Neurosci. 2024; 138(4):260-271.

PMID: 38753398 PMC: 11894610. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000590.


Cortico-striatal action control inherent of opponent cognitive-motivational styles.

Avila C, Sarter M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559086 PMC: 10979997. DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.12.584623.


References
1.
Dar R, Rosen-Korakin N, Shapira O, Gottlieb Y, Frenk H . The craving to smoke in flight attendants: relations with smoking deprivation, anticipation of smoking, and actual smoking. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010; 119(1):248-53. DOI: 10.1037/a0017778. View

2.
Saunders B, Robinson T . Individual variation in the motivational properties of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36(8):1668-76. PMC: 3138662. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2011.48. View

3.
Milton A, Everitt B . The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: implications for the treatment of addiction. Eur J Neurosci. 2010; 31(12):2308-19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07249.x. View

4.
Sarter M, Fritschy J . Reporting statistical methods and statistical results in EJN. Eur J Neurosci. 2008; 28(12):2363-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06581.x. View

5.
Lovic V, Saunders B, Yager L, Robinson T . Rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues are also prone to impulsive action. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 223(2):255-61. PMC: 3119757. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.006. View