» Articles » PMID: 28655951

Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain™ with ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2017 Jun 29
PMID 28655951
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Second generation supraglottic airways are increasingly being used in surgical patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Preventing aspiration at higher airway pressures may be at the expense of a higher cuff pressure which can impair mucosal perfusion. We attempted to elucidate whether Ambu AuraGain™ (AAU) would provide a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) with a lower mucosal pressure in comparison to ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA).

Methods: This was a prospective randomised study involving sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia, using either AAU (Group AAU [ = 30]) or PLMA (Group PLMA [ = 30]) for elective ventilation. Primary outcome measure was the OLP. Number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion, time required for placement and calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressure were the secondary outcome measures. Data were analysed using Student's -test and Chi-square test.

Results: No significant difference in the OLP was noted in both groups. The ease of insertion and success rate at first attempt was similar between the groups. Time taken for insertion in Group AAU was longer than Group PLMA (13.57 ± 1.94 vs. 11.60 ± 2.22 s). The calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressures were lower with Group AAU than Group PLMA for all 3 sizes. The minimum cuff pressure and minimum cuff volume required to prevent leak were found similar in both groups.

Conclusion: AAU provides adequate sealing pressures and effective ventilation with lower calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressure, compared to PLMA.

Citing Articles

Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.

Salhotra R, Padhy A, Rautela R, Singh D Indian J Anaesth. 2023; 67(5):426-431.

PMID: 37333703 PMC: 10269987. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_203_22.


A randomized comparative study of three supraglottic airway devices for controlled ventilation in anesthetized patients.

Sharma M, Sharma B, Gupta M, Panday B, Sahai C, Sood J J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 38(2):221-227.

PMID: 36171925 PMC: 9511860. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_465_20.


Comparison of LMA Protector vs. endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Yilmaz M, Turan A, Saracoglu A, Saracoglu K Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022; 54(3):247-252.

PMID: 36000695 PMC: 10156507. DOI: 10.5114/ait.2022.118878.


A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube.

Lal J, Bansal T, Somesh S, Jain M J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 37(4):641-647.

PMID: 35340953 PMC: 8944383. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_387_19.


Comparison of Ambu AuraGain at low cuff pressure, Ambu AuraGain at high cuff pressure and i-gel in relation to incidence of postoperative upper airway complications.

Deepak G, Kumar R, Agarwal M, Bharadwaj M, Kumar N, Sarma R Indian J Anaesth. 2021; 65(6):439-444.

PMID: 34248186 PMC: 8252994. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_189_21.


References
1.
Lopez A, Agusti M, Gambus P, Pons M, Anglada T, Valero R . A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016; 31(6):1255-1262. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9963-0. View

2.
Pennant J, White P . The laryngeal mask airway. Its uses in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 1993; 79(1):144-63. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199307000-00021. View

3.
Asai T, Howell T, Koga K, Morris S . Appropriate size and inflation of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 80(4):470-4. DOI: 10.1093/bja/80.4.470. View

4.
Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Gebhardt E . A randomised comparison of the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® supreme in infants and children. Anaesthesia. 2015; 71(2):205-12. DOI: 10.1111/anae.13330. View

5.
Marjot R . Pressure exerted by the laryngeal mask airway cuff upon the pharyngeal mucosa. Br J Anaesth. 1993; 70(1):25-9. DOI: 10.1093/bja/70.1.25. View