Objective:
To test whether a multistrategy intervention enhanced recovery immediately and longitudinally in patients with severe to moderate upper extremity (UE) paresis.
Design:
Double-blind, randomized controlled trial with placebo control.
Setting:
Outpatient department of a local medical center.
Participants:
People (N=25) with chronic stroke were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a transcranial direct current stimulation with sensory modulation (tDCS-SM) group (n=14; mean age ± SD, 55.3±11.4y) or a control group (n=11; mean age ± SD, 56.9±13.5y).
Interventions:
Eight-week intervention. The tDCS-SM group received bilateral tDCS, bilateral cutaneous anesthesia, and high repetitions of passive movements on the paretic hand. The control group received the same passive movements but with sham tDCS and sham anesthesia. During the experiment, all participants continued their regular rehabilitation.
Main Outcome Measures:
Voluntary UE movement, spasticity, UE function, and basic activities of daily living. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, at postintervention, and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
Results:
No significant differences were found between groups. However, there was a trend that the voluntary UE movement improved more in the tDCS-SM group than in the control group, with a moderate immediate effect (partial η [η]=.14, P=.07) and moderate long-term effects (3-mo follow-up: η=.17, P=.05; 6-mo follow-up: η=.12, P=.10). Compared with the control group, the tDCS-SM group had a trend of a small immediate effect (η=.02-.04) on reducing spasticity, but no long-term effect. A trend of small immediate and long-term effects in favor of tDCS-SM was found on UE function and daily function recovery (η=.02-.09).
Conclusions:
Accompanied with traditional rehabilitation, tDCS-SM had a nonsignificant trend of having immediate and longitudinal effects on voluntary UE movement recovery in patients with severe to moderate UE paresis after stroke, but its effects on spasticity reduction and functional recovery may be limited.
Citing Articles
Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model.
Yoon M, Park H, Yoo Y, Oh H, Im S, Kim T
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2850.
PMID: 38310134
PMC: 10838316.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52874-y.
Barriers to Enrollment in Post-Stroke Brain Stimulation in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.
Hodics T, Cohen L, Pezzullo J, Kowalske K, Dromerick A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022; 36(9):596-602.
PMID: 35925037
PMC: 9509403.
DOI: 10.1177/15459683221088861.
Rehabilitation Interventions Combined with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Function in Stroke Patients.
Cha T, Hwang H
Brain Sci. 2022; 12(8).
PMID: 35892435
PMC: 9332761.
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12080994.
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Rehabilitation on Arm and Hand Function in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lee J, Jeun Y, Park H, Jung Y
Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(12).
PMID: 34946431
PMC: 8701815.
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121705.
An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study.
Choi G, Han C, Lee H, Paik N, Kim W, Hwang H
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021; 18(1):176.
PMID: 34930380
PMC: 8686235.
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00972-7.
The Long-Term Maintenance of Upper Limb Motor Improvements Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Rehabilitation in People with Stroke: A Systematic Review of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials.
Navarro-Lopez V, Del Valle-Gratacos M, Fernandez-Matias R, Carratala-Tejada M, Cuesta-Gomez A, Molina-Rueda F
Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(15).
PMID: 34372453
PMC: 8347930.
DOI: 10.3390/s21155216.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 11:CD009645.
PMID: 33175411
PMC: 8095012.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.
Does anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation of the damaged primary motor cortex affects wrist flexor muscle spasticity and also activity of the wrist flexor and extensor muscles in patients with stroke?: a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Halakoo S, Ehsani F, Masoudian N, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S
Neurol Sci. 2020; 42(7):2763-2773.
PMID: 33150514
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04858-9.
Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with aerobic exercise to optimize cortical priming in stroke.
Sivaramakrishnan A, Madhavan S
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020; 46(5):426-435.
PMID: 33095999
PMC: 9009262.
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0677.
Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.
Fregni F, El-Hagrassy M, Pacheco-Barrios K, Carvalho S, Leite J, Simis M
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020; 24(4):256-313.
PMID: 32710772
PMC: 8059493.
DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051.
Pragmatic Solutions for Stroke Recovery and Improved Quality of Life in Low- and Middle-Income Countries-A Systematic Review.
Ekechukwu E, Olowoyo P, Nwankwo K, Olaleye O, Ogbodo V, Hamzat T
Front Neurol. 2020; 11:337.
PMID: 32695058
PMC: 7336355.
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00337.
Recruitment challenges in stroke neurorecovery clinical trials.
Ferreira I, Pinto C, Saleh Velez F, Leffa D, de Toledo Piza P, Fregni F
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019; 15:100404.
PMID: 31360793
PMC: 6639562.
DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100404.
Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke.
Coscia M, Wessel M, Chaudary U, Millan J, Micera S, Guggisberg A
Brain. 2019; 142(8):2182-2197.
PMID: 31257411
PMC: 6658861.
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz181.