» Articles » PMID: 28647912

Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Technology: What Does It Change in Autoantibody Detection?

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Jun 26
PMID 28647912
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diagnostic technology is rapidly evolving, and over the last decade, substantial progress has been made even for the identification of antibodies, increasingly approaching this type of diagnostic to that of automated clinical chemistry laboratory. In this review, we describe the analytical and diagnostic characteristics of chemiluminescence technology in its strength and in its applicability for a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. The wide dynamic range, greater than that of immunoenzymatic methods, the high sensitivity and specificity of the results expressed in quantitative form, the high degree of automation and the clinical implications related to the reduction in the turnaround time, and the ability to run a large number of antibody tests (even of different isotypes), directed towards large antigenic panels in random access mode, make this technology the most advanced in the clinical laboratory, with enormous repercussions on the workflow and on the autoimmunology laboratory organisation. Further improvements are expected in the coming years with the development of new analytical platforms such as the flow-injection chemiluminescent immunoassay, the two-dimensional resolution for chemiluminescence multiplex immunoassay and the magnetic nanoparticles chemiluminescence immunoassay, which will likely result in additional increases in the clinical efficacy of antibody tests.

Citing Articles

Novel Automated Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for the Detection of Autoantibodies Against Aquaporin-4 in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.

Yamazaki N, Takahashi T, Misu T, Nishikawa Y Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941228 PMC: 11816824. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030298.


Development and Application of a Fully Automated Chemiluminescence Enzyme Immunoassay for the Detection of Antibodies Against Porcine Circovirus 3 Cap.

Wang L, Li D, Zeng D, Wang X, Liu Y, Peng G Viruses. 2025; 16(12.

PMID: 39772232 PMC: 11680332. DOI: 10.3390/v16121925.


Room temperature quantitative liquid concentration device and application to interleukins analysis in a B-cell culture medium.

Kawanabe R, Tazawa H, Mawatari K, Yoshizaki A Anal Sci. 2024; 41(2):145-150.

PMID: 39562488 PMC: 11750909. DOI: 10.1007/s44211-024-00688-3.


Navigating the Landscape of B Cell Mediated Immunity and Antibody Monitoring in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Efficacy: Tools, Strategies and Clinical Trial Insights.

OReilly S, Byrne J, Feeney E, Mallon P, Gautier V Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39460256 PMC: 11511438. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12101089.


Current advances in Hepatitis C diagnostics.

Baber A, Suganthan B, Ramasamy R J Biol Eng. 2024; 18(1):48.

PMID: 39252065 PMC: 11385151. DOI: 10.1186/s13036-024-00443-2.


References
1.
Tozzoli R, Bizzaro N . The clinical autoimmunologist and the laboratory autoimmunologist: the two sides of the coin. Autoimmun Rev. 2012; 11(10):766-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.02.011. View

2.
Mahler M, Fritzler M . Anti-dsDNA antibody testing in the clinic: Farr or ELISA?. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007; 3(2):72-3. DOI: 10.1038/ncprheum0398. View

3.
Vaidya B, Pearce S . Diagnosis and management of thyrotoxicosis. BMJ. 2014; 349:g5128. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5128. View

4.
Nossent H, Rekvig O . Antinuclear antibody screening in this new millennium: farewell to the microscope?. Scand J Rheumatol. 2001; 30(3):123-6; discussion 127-8. DOI: 10.1080/030097401300162860. View

5.
Lynch M, Woodford N . Sudden unexpected death in the setting of undiagnosed Graves' disease. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014; 10(3):452-6. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-014-9576-1. View