» Articles » PMID: 28645167

"It's Important, But…": Perceived Barriers and Situational Dependencies to Social Contact Preferences of Nursing Home Residents

Overview
Journal Gerontologist
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2017 Jun 25
PMID 28645167
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: U.S. Nursing homes (NH) are shifting toward a person-centered philosophy of care, where staff understand each residents preferences, goals and values, and seek to honor them throughout the care delivery process. Social interactions are a major component of life and while low rates of social interactions are typically found among NH residents, little research has examined resident preferences for specific types of social interactions. The purpose of this study is to explore, from the perspective of the NH resident, barriers to social contact preferences and situations when social preferences change.

Research Design And Methods: Two interviews were conducted with 255 NH residents 3 months apart, recruited from 32 NHs using 13 social-contact items from the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory-NH.

Results: Content analysis of 1,461 spontaneous comments identified perceived barriers to preference fulfillment along with reasons why residents would change their mind about the importance of a preference (situational dependencies). Nearly 50% of social preferences for choosing a roommate, having regular contact with friends, giving gifts, and volunteering were associated with barriers. Social preferences were likely to change based upon the quality of the social interaction and the resident's level of interest.

Discussion And Implications: Knowledge of barriers regarding social preferences can inform care efforts vital to advancing the delivery of person-centered care. In addition, understanding the reasons why NH resident preferences change based upon context can help providers with staff training leading to individualized care and develop meaningful social programs that are in line with resident preferences.

Citing Articles

Social interaction of people living with dementia in residential long-term care: an ecological momentary assessment study.

Gebhard D, Lang L, Maier M, Dichter M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1640.

PMID: 39716279 PMC: 11668022. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-12056-y.


Eating Together but Often Feeling Lonely: Residents' Mealtime Experiences in a Nursing Home.

Nielsen M, Harstade C, Sandgren A J Clin Nurs. 2024; 34(1):259-267.

PMID: 39568155 PMC: 11655421. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17561.


Nursing Home Resident Preferences for Daily Care and Activities: A Latent Class Analysis of National Data.

Duan Y, Ng W, Bowblis J, Akosionu O, Shippee T Gerontologist. 2023; 64(2).

PMID: 37432373 PMC: 10825845. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad089.


Provincial policies affecting resident quality of life in Canadian residential long-term care.

Irwin P, Taylor D, Keefe J BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):362.

PMID: 37296381 PMC: 10252178. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04074-y.


Integrating social support into interventions among the elderly in nursing homes: a scoping review.

Behrendt D, Spieker S, Sumngern C, Wendschuh V BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e071962.

PMID: 37085297 PMC: 10124279. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071962.


References
1.
Lockenhoff C, Carstensen L . Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: the increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. J Pers. 2004; 72(6):1395-424. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00301.x. View

2.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

3.
Kane R . Long-term care and a good quality of life: bringing them closer together. Gerontologist. 2001; 41(3):293-304. DOI: 10.1093/geront/41.3.293. View

4.
Casey A, Low L, Jeon Y, Brodaty H . Residents Perceptions of Friendship and Positive Social Networks Within a Nursing Home. Gerontologist. 2015; 56(5):855-67. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnv146. View

5.
Kiely D, Flacker J . The protective effect of social engagement on 1-year mortality in a long-stay nursing home population. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(5):472-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00030-1. View