» Articles » PMID: 28633411

Surgeon-Level Variability in Outcomes, Cost, and Comorbidity Adjusted-Cost for Elective Lumbar Decompression and Fusion

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2017 Jun 22
PMID 28633411
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The costs and outcomes following degenerative spine surgery may vary from surgeon to surgeon. Patient factors such as comorbidities may increase the health care cost. These variations are not well studied.

Objective: To understand the variation in outcomes, costs, and comorbidity-adjusted cost for surgeons performing lumbar laminectomy and fusions surgery.

Methods: A total of 752 patients undergoing laminectomy and fusion, performed by 7 surgeons, were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes and 90-d cost were analyzed. Multivariate regression model was built for high-cost surgery. A separate linear regression model was built to derive comorbidity-adjusted 90-d costs.

Results: No significant differences in improvement were found across all the patient-reported outcomes, complications, and readmission among the surgeons. In multivariable model, surgeons #4 (P < .0001) and #6 (P = .002) had higher odds of performing high-cost fusion surgery. The comorbidity-adjusted costs were higher than the actual 90-d costs for surgeons #1 (P = .08), #3 (P = .002), #5 (P < .0001), and #7 (P < .0001), whereas they were lower than the actual costs for surgeons #2 (P = .128), #4 (P < .0001), and #6 (P = .44).

Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insight into variations in 90-d costs among the surgeons performing elective lumbar laminectomy and fusion at a single institution. Specific surgeons were found to have greater odds of performing high-cost surgeries. Adjusting for preoperative comorbidities, however, led to costs that were higher than the actual costs for certain surgeons and lower than the actual costs for others. Patients' preoperative comorbidities must be accounted for when crafting value-based payment models. Furthermore, designing intervention targeting "modifiable" factors tied to the way the surgeons practice may increase the overall value of spine care.

Citing Articles

Variations in surgical practice and short-term outcomes for degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spondylolisthesis: do surgeon training and experience matter?.

Shetty K, Chen P, Brara H, Anand N, Skaggs D, Calsavara V Int J Qual Health Care. 2023; 36(1).

PMID: 38156345 PMC: 10849168. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad109.


Drivers of Cost in Primary Single-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Hwang R, Golenbock S, Kim D Global Spine J. 2021; 13(3):804-811.

PMID: 33832351 PMC: 10240603. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211009182.


Effect of Surgical Setting on Hospital-Reported Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spinal Procedures: Tertiary Versus Community Hospitals.

Weir T, Sardesai N, Jauregui J, Jazini E, Sokolow M, Usmani M Global Spine J. 2020; 10(4):375-383.

PMID: 32435555 PMC: 7222676. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219848666.


Variation in Physician-Specific Episode Payments for Major Cancer Surgery and Implications for the Merit-Based Incentive Program.

Kaye D, Dunn R, Li J, Herrel L, Dupree J, Miller D J Surg Res. 2019; 236:30-36.

PMID: 30694769 PMC: 6377848. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.073.


The Stability of Physician-Specific Episode Costs for Urologic Cancer Surgery: Implications for Urologists Under the Merit-Based Incentive Program.

Kaye D, Ye Z, Li J, Herrel L, Dupree J, Ellimoottil C Urology. 2018; 123:114-119.

PMID: 30125647 PMC: 7569402. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.051.