» Articles » PMID: 28632001

Vasodilator Responsiveness in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Identifying a Distinct Phenotype with Distinct Physiology and Distinct Prognosis

Overview
Journal Pulm Circ
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2017 Jun 21
PMID 28632001
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Within the cohort of patients suffering from idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is a group that responds dramatically (VR-PAH) to an acute vasodilator challenge and that has excellent long-term hemodynamic improvement and prognosis on high dose calcium channel blockers compared with vasodilator non-responders (VN-PAH). For the purposes of diagnosing VR-PAH, there is to date no test to replace the acute vasodilator challenge. However, recent studies have identified markers that may aid in the identification of VR-PAH, including peripheral blood lymphocyte RNA expression levels of desmogelin-2 and Ras homolog gene family member Q, and plasma levels of provirus integration site for Moloney murine leukemia virus. Genome wide-array studies of peripheral blood DNA have demonstrated differences in disease specific genetic variants between VR-PAH and NR-PAH, with particular convergence on cytoskeletal function pathways and Wnt signaling pathways. These studies offer hope for future non-invasive identification of VR-PAH, and insights into pathogenesis that may lead to novel therapies. Examination of the degree of pulmonary microvascular perfusion in PAH has offered additional insights. During the acute vasodilator challenge, VR-PAH patients demonstrate true vasodilation with recruitment and increased perfusion of the capillary bed, while VN-PAH patients are unable to recruit vasculature. In the very few reports of lung histology, VR-PAH has more medial thickening in the precapillary arterioles, while VN-PAH has the classic histology of PAH, including intimal thickening. VR-PAH is a disorder with a phenotype distinct from VN-PAH and other types of PAH, and should be considered separately in the classification of PAH.

Citing Articles

mTOR Signaling in Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Pathogenic Role and Therapeutic Target.

Babicheva A, Makino A, Yuan J Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(4).

PMID: 33670032 PMC: 7926633. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042144.


Electrical Stimulation-Guided Approach to Pulmonary Artery Catheter Ablation in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Pilot Feasibility Study with a 12-Month Follow-Up.

Goncharova N, Moiseeva O, Condori Leandro H, Zlobina I, Berezina A, Malikov K Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:8919515.

PMID: 32149144 PMC: 7048906. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8919515.

References
1.
Rich S, Martinez J, Lam W, Rosen K . Captopril as treatment for patients with pulmonary hypertension. Problem of variability in assessing chronic drug treatment. Br Heart J. 1982; 48(3):272-7. PMC: 481241. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.48.3.272. View

2.
Ruskin J, Hutter Jr A . Primary pulmonary hypertension treated with oral phentolamine. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 90(5):772-4. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-5-772. View

3.
Stacher E, Graham B, Hunt J, Gandjeva A, Groshong S, McLaughlin V . Modern age pathology of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012; 186(3):261-72. PMC: 3886716. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201201-0164OC. View

4.
Cohen M, Kronzon I . Adverse hemodynamic effects of phentolamine in primary pulmonary hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1981; 95(5):591-2. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-95-5-591. View

5.
Opitz C, Wensel R, Bettmann M, Schaffarczyk R, Linscheid M, Hetzer R . Assessment of the vasodilator response in primary pulmonary hypertension. Comparing prostacyclin and iloprost administered by either infusion or inhalation. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(4):356-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00302-0. View