» Articles » PMID: 28631528

Determined to Stop? Longitudinal Analysis of the Desire to Have No More Children in Rural Mozambique

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Jun 21
PMID 28631528
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classic demographic theories conceptualize desired family size as a fixed goal that guides fertility intentions over the childbearing years. However, a growing body of research shows that fertility plans, even nominally long-term plans for completed childbearing, change in response to short-term conditions. Because of data limitations, much of this research has focused on low-fertility contexts, but short-term conditions are likely to be even more important in high-fertility contexts. This paper uses three waves of survey data collected in rural Mozambique to study predictors of the desire to stop childbearing in a context of relatively high fertility and high individual and social instability. We use fixed effects models to assess how women's desires to stop childbearing are shaped by demographic factors, household economic conditions, and health status, controlling for constant individual characteristics. Results provide evidence that fertility desires both reflect stable underlying goals and evolve in response to individual and social circumstances.

Citing Articles

Women's desire to limit child-bearing and its associated factors in rural Ethiopia: A multilevel analysis.

Kidie A, Aychiluhm S, Ayal B, Kodo T, Fentie E, Masresha S Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e25372.

PMID: 38327416 PMC: 10847642. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25372.


Investigating the relationship between growing season quality and childbearing goals.

Brooks N, Grace K, Kristiansen D, Shukla S, Brown M Glob Environ Change. 2023; 80:102677.

PMID: 37250477 PMC: 10209476. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102677.


"I know my body and I just can't get pregnant that easily" - Women's use and non-use of the injection to manage fertility.

Bornstein M, Norris A, Shaba G, Huber-Krum S, Gipson J SSM Qual Res Health. 2023; 2.

PMID: 37021076 PMC: 10069985. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100071.


The illusion of stable fertility preferences.

Muller M, Hamory J, Johnson-Hanks J, Miguel E Popul Stud (Camb). 2022; 76(2):169-189.

PMID: 35576966 PMC: 9256780. DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2022.2057577.


Pathways to Low Fertility: 50 Years of Limitation, Curtailment, and Postponement of Childbearing.

Timaeus I, Moultrie T Demography. 2020; 57(1):267-296.

PMID: 31970647 PMC: 7051933. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-019-00848-5.


References
1.
Yeatman S, Sennott C, Culpepper S . Young women's dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility. Demography. 2013; 50(5):1715-37. PMC: 3786023. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-013-0214-4. View

2.
Liefbroer A . Changes in Family Size Intentions Across Young Adulthood: A Life-Course Perspective. Eur J Popul. 2009; 25(4):363-386. PMC: 2791833. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-008-9173-7. View

3.
Thomson E . Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography. 1997; 34(3):343-54. View

4.
Hayford S, Agadjanian V . From desires to behavior: Moderating factors in a fertility transition. Demogr Res. 2013; 26:511-542. PMC: 3634800. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.20. View

5.
Sennott C, Yeatman S . Stability and change in fertility preferences among young women in Malawi. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 38(1):34-42. PMC: 3322634. DOI: 10.1363/3803412. View