» Articles » PMID: 28627918

Development and Validation of the Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Problems

Overview
Journal Psychol Assess
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Jun 20
PMID 28627918
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The interpersonal circumplex (IPC) is a well-established model of social behavior that spans basic personality and clinical science. Although several measures are available to assess interpersonal functioning (e.g., motives, traits) within an IPC framework, researchers studying interpersonal difficulties have relied primarily on a single measure, the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex Scales (IIP-C; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000). Although the IIP-C is a widely used measure, it is currently the only measure specifically designed to assess maladaptive interpersonal behavior using the IPC framework. The purpose of the current study is to describe a new 64-item measure of interpersonal problems, called the Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Problems (CSIP). Interpersonal problems derived from a pool of 400 personality-related problems were assessed in two large university samples. In the scale development sample (N = 1,197), items that best characterized each sector of the IPC were identified, and a set of eight 8-item circumplex scales was developed. Psychometric properties of the resulting measure were then examined in the validation sample (N = 757). Results from confirmatory circumplex structural analyses indicated that the CSIP fit well to a quasi-circumplex model. The CSIP converged with the IIP-C and the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (Wiggins, 1995), and associated in theoretically expected ways with broader assessments of adaptive- and maladaptive-range personality traits and symptoms of psychological distress. The CSIP augments the IIP-C with additional content, thereby helping to extend the underlying constructs, and provides an alternative means for studying the interpersonal consequences of personality and psychopathology. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Psychometric evaluation of a Visual Interpersonal Analog Scale.

Woods W, Edershile E, Ringwald W, Sharpe B, Himmelstein P, Newman M Psychol Assess. 2023; 35(4):311-324.

PMID: 36656726 PMC: 10107404. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001210.


An atlas of personality, emotion and behaviour.

Mobbs A PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227877.

PMID: 31961895 PMC: 6974095. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227877.


The latent structure of interpersonal problems: Validity of dimensional, categorical, and hybrid models.

Wendt L, Wright A, Pilkonis P, Nolte T, Fonagy P, Montague P J Abnorm Psychol. 2019; 128(8):823-839.

PMID: 31556632 PMC: 6816327. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000460.


Development and Validation of a Circumplex Measure of the Interpersonal Culture in Work Teams and Organizations.

Locke K Front Psychol. 2019; 10:850.

PMID: 31118910 PMC: 6504781. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00850.

References
1.
Wright A, Hallquist M, Morse J, Scott L, Stepp S, Nolf K . Clarifying interpersonal heterogeneity in borderline personality disorder using latent mixture modeling. J Pers Disord. 2013; 27(2):125-43. PMC: 3607958. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2013.27.2.125. View

2.
Guadagnoli E, Velicer W . A Comparison of Pattern Matching Indices. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 26(2):323-43. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2602_7. View

3.
Wright A, Thomas K, Hopwood C, Markon K, Pincus A, Krueger R . The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012; 121(4):951-7. PMC: 3389150. DOI: 10.1037/a0027669. View

4.
Acton G, Revelle W . Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria. J Pers Assess. 2003; 79(3):446-71. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7903_04. View

5.
Oltmanns T, Melley A, Turkheimer E . Impaired social functioning and symptoms of personality disorders assessed by peer and self-report in a nonclinical population. J Pers Disord. 2002; 16(5):437-52. PMC: 4368180. DOI: 10.1521/pedi.16.5.437.22123. View